SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tommaso who wrote (64085)7/6/1999 4:50:00 PM
From: Freedom Fighter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
T,

Good article. AG made his own bed. Unfortunately guys like us are going to have to sleep in it.

The encouraging part is that more and more of the mainstream press is starting to understand how serious the situation is.

One comment on a point in the article. It's true that it is very difficult to say with certainty what the fair value of American business is. There's a lot of subjective interpretations of data and no two people will exactly agree about the future. But we do have over 100 years of market history to look at, numerous models, common sense,
etc... So there's a range of views that most reasonable people could accept. Unfortunately, we are so far outside all reasonable interpretations that the Fed has no excuse for not acting long ago. The situation is plain and simple out of control and quite dangerous IMO. The Fed could have acted under its mandate of sustainable economic growth (depsite the low reported CPI). How can one of the greatest financial asset bubbles ever, fueled by extraordinary credit growth be consistent with the Fed's mandate of sustainable growth? History tells us that all such periods have ended very badly, so clearly the situation demands caution. AG has done nothing but flap his gums and add fuel to the fire.

Wayne



To: Tommaso who wrote (64085)7/6/1999 6:02:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
T, It is a pickle he changed from a cucumber. <g>



To: Tommaso who wrote (64085)7/7/1999 2:38:00 AM
From: Simba  Respond to of 132070
 
The article says:

"One reason is that asset-price inflation is relatively uncharted terrain for traditional economists - including economists at the Fed."

I thought the FED (not this one) has seen previous boom and busts. Also it says that it is difficult to measure stock valuations as compared to measuring price inflation. It is difficult to believe that.