Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zia Sun(zsun) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (3188)	7/6/1999 4:48:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10354

Francois, I doubt Bob has a special place in his heart for me. I was just wondering because most times a long suspension or termination awaits those who violate the TOU in the fashion you did. You even cried when they reinstated flodyie, but didn't mind doing the same violation yourself. You are an example of hypocrisy in action. Of course it looks like you got away with it scot free. Maybe it's you who has special dispensation from SI Bob. Barb

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (3188)	7/6/1999 4:49:00 PM
From: StockDung	Respond to of 10354

Just like USAT, ZSUN will follow the Truthseekers prediction. Humor of the day; Talk : Communications : USAT Long Distance Telecommunications \| Previous \| Next \| Respond \| To: Mitch Aunger (375 ) From: Francois Goelo Saturday, Jul 3 1999 1:05AM ET Reply # of 384 Here are details of a POTENTIAL MILESTONE LAW SUIT that... could result in a CLEANING UP of the BOARDS where Short Selling Bashers (SSB's) have been roaming unimpeded for far too long: Message 10372435 Regards, F. Goelo + + + To: Thomas DeSousa (382 ) From: Francois Goelo Tuesday, Jul 6 1999 10:33AM ET Reply # of 384 What else to expect from SSB's? I posted here to give a little comfort... and perhaps a chuckle to some poor battered shareholders. BTW, since we started calling the Certificates, an idea so many Short Selling Bashers (SSB's) derided, #ZSUN# is up from $7.20 to $11.25, in just a few days. Just show that if you fight back, the SSB's cohorts are powerless.... F. Goelo + + +

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (3188)	7/6/1999 5:33:00 PM
From: StockDung	Respond to of 10354

...The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants and the plaintiff appeals contending that material issues of fact are in dispute and therefore a trial on the merits is necessary. The complaint originally alleged four separate causes of action; Count I claimed tortious interference with plaintiff's prospective business advantage, Count II claimed injurious falsehood, Count III claimed deliberate interference with plaintiff's public offering, and Count IV claimed violations of various Illinois consumer statutes. Judge Marshall, to whom the case was originally assigned, dismissed Counts II and IV. That decision is not at issue in this appeal. Subsequently, the case was reassigned to Judge Getzendanner who granted summary judgment for the defendants on the two remaining counts. The plaintiff then filed this appeal. We conclude that the district judge properly and thoroughly addressed the issues raised and we hereby affirm and adopt the district court's opinion (reproduced in the Appendix). casp.net