SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PROLIFE who wrote (26018)7/7/1999 12:15:00 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39621
 
No, I'm not press, but thanks. How would you prevent race from being mentioned when it is the motive for the crime? Should the motive for a murder not be mentioned in the press? And would you not release the identities of the victims so as to keep the racial motive a secret? Think you're being overly sensitive on the race issue.

What facts of the Resendez Ramirez case should go unreported IYO? The murders he's committed aren't racially motivated apparently. Should we keep the identiities of everyone involved a secret? How about the locations? And how could this be done?

I know the problem of copycat crimes. It would be good if marketing driven hype could be minimized. A good example is that stupid movie on the Son of Sam that is coming out. There's a possibility there's some other nut out there that'd like to feel special and be the center of attention. And why is it being made? $$$.

Hey, I find this a little ironic:

Shall we take a camera in for a closeup of the blood and guts, would
that make it better?


and

I have a picture of an aborted child much bigger, should you care to see
him.


Bruce



To: PROLIFE who wrote (26018)7/7/1999 8:45:00 AM
From: mark silvers  Respond to of 39621
 
Dan,

<<. The story is that one human took another humans life.>>

In all honesty, you felt it was relevant when the girl at columbine reiterated her beliefs in Christ just before she was killed.....

Mark