Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : XSNI - X-Stream Network -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon C who wrote (1848)	7/7/1999 2:01:00 AM
From: Jeffrey D	Respond to of 3519

Jon, thanks. I appreciate it. Jeff

To: Jon C who wrote (1848)	7/7/1999 7:31:00 AM
From: Jacalyn Deaner	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3519

Jonathan Capper - the attorneys AREN'T watching me nor Mike Langdon - they are watching xstream UK AND XSNI. As for SPAM - I email Manning and the other officers of the corporation to get information and I email other third parties that manning claims to have had negotiated contracts with, to validate and verify. I also CALL the UK to get information, made a call yesterday as a matter of fact. And I have ONLY emailed every officer a maximum of 3 times with SPECIFIC questions and concerns. I understand from your posts you write once a week, and Mike Langdon is there every day practically, notifying them when he gets his email address changes, so they know how to contact him. Now that is SPAM - useless dribble. Documents can and have been electronically produced - all from public record. The only actionable enterprise is to have xstream UK answer investor questions and disclose exactly what XSNI is, why Lehmans denied associations and why manning doesn't or can't have third party verification of XSNI being the IPO; why the US shareholders haven't received the physical copy of the February 1999 statement of account; why the April 30, 1999 statement hasn't been produced yet, when foreign XSNI shareholders were notified that the printing of the April 30, 1999 statement was "ready". XSNI is traded publicly in the US, I am a shareholder, and I AM going to find out exactly what I want to know, and it IS going to be verifiable with third parties. If you are talking with execs of xstream UK and your pal Mike Langdon and he is giving you feed, well you guys will be producing too. Yesterday you thought it would take the UK 15 years to catch up with the US vis a vis legal manipulations; 12 hours later you know everything about subversion. Practically the same "stupidity" displayed when you began posting - first you know nothing about XSNI only that you hold shares from previously worthless firecrest/megacom paper. Throughout your postings, come to find out you are well knowledged in particular SEC rules and regs, dole out little bits and pieces of information that on the surface are obnoxious and condescending but usually provide links to "others". Jeffrey D aka JS did post something about Weitrich having an office right around here in DALLAS - I haven't spammed him and he is associated with xstream UK. Better get ALL your facts together prior to threatening innuendos. You can have those attorneys on both sides of the atlantic contact me anytime. BTW - who have YOU been talking with lately? If there is any action taken, imagine what you will be called to produce, and our man of integrity, Mike Langdon, and all his associations, profitpicks.com. and all of foxhayes, xstream UK, xstream Canada, nethead, documents relating to XSNI, firecrest, megacom digital, corporate officers, employees. This would be messy as manning involved Lehmans, UK, Andy Laslow and the "banker", so of course, I would have to get those documents too or statements as the case may be. Are you threatening me Jonathan Capper with your innuendo? You and Jeffrey D aka JS became obsessed with legal innuendos yesterday and fail to realize that I am not the target - I am asking for validation for XSNI; why is everyone so afraid to find out what XSNI is or is not? and why doesn't Capper nor Jeffrey D aka JS care? I am a shareholder and I am entitled to know what I am holding, and I am going to get the truth. That is all I want. Manning may return your weekly emails promptly, but he has yet to answer up any of the pertinent facts and get the record straight. I am not manipulating the price of the stock, I am not shorting, I am not doing anything subversive, as a matter of fact, didn't you, Jonathan Capper, indicate that Manning said he does NOT consider "threads" relevant and has no effect on his decision making? If anyone has substantiated and documented actionable cause - it is I. Jacalyn M. Deaner EDIT - you will note I contacted foxhayes yesterday and REQUESTED the barrister most practiced in business law discuss this matter with manning and cited ALL the problems to date. As a courtesy to manning so he is not blindsided - I also sent the same email to manning so he would know what to expect, if that barrister chooses to discuss the XSNI matter with his "partner". Seems those are the attorneys that should be watching this company since they put it together. Counsel is already looking at this matter for me, this has taken quite a toll...so in addition to answering to and for me, cause has beene stablished for counter suit actionable cause for damages if suits are so desired. Now I have other good stocks to tend to today and get ready for a week of company with my niece and sister in law. I shall be keeping tabs you can be sure.

To: Jon C who wrote (1848)	7/7/1999 10:29:00 AM
From: Jacalyn Deaner	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3519

OT Jonathan Capper - DIAL remember that - what are you and Jeffery D aka JS doing with that now? Seems to have hit the wall and sliding down, painfully slowly; remember my last post to you over there on June 9, 1999 - what the Hemscott boys are saying about DIAL - thank goodness I did some DD on that one too and did not get involved with that. Thanks for your "tip", but I don't think I need your advice. :) Jacalyn M. Deaner To: Jon C (83 ) From: Jeffrey D Wednesday, Jun 9 1999 9:25AM ET Reply # of 87 DIAL news. Looks great! Jeff