SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Hunt who wrote (36768)7/7/1999 8:59:00 AM
From: J.L. Turner  Respond to of 116790
 
Interesting take on the feds:

Reading an article in this April's Chronicles magazine, "Cajuns
Uncaged," made my day.
Last October, by nearly a 60 percent majority, Louisianians
approved Amendment 1 to their state constitution. Amendment
1 declares: "The people of this state have the sole and
exclusive right of governing themselves as a free and sovereign
state; and do, and forever hereafter shall, exercise and enjoy
every power, jurisdiction, and right pertaining thereto, which is
not, or may not hereafter be, by them expressly delegated to
the United States in Congress assembled."

Louisiana's amendment would be entirely unnecessary if the
White House, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court didn't
have disdain for the U.S. Constitution. What the citizens of
Louisiana seek is already part of the protections found in our
Constitution. The Ninth Amendment reads, "The enumeration in
the Constitution of certain rights, shall not be construed to
deny or disparage others retained by the people." The 10th
Amendment reads, "The powers not delegated to the United
States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States,
are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Both the Ninth and 10th Amendments are held in the deepest
contempt and disrespect by the White House, Congress and
the Supreme Court. Why? Because these amendments were
written to protect against consolidation of power by the federal
government. Dismissal of the Ninth and 10th Amendments
allows Congress to control our schools, mandate speed limits,
and require employment and college admissions quotas, as
well as other forms of Washington tyranny. Today, little states
can do nothing without Washington's permission. That was not
the Framers' vision.

What would Williams do if he were Louisiana governor with
such a mandate from the people? I would write Congress,
stating that Louisiana citizens are reclaiming their rights
guaranteed by the Constitution. Respecting the Constitution
and disobeying Congress would surely invite retaliation.
Congress might threaten to cut off Medicaid reimbursements
and
highway-construction funds if Louisiana didn't follow their
dictates.

Faced with congressional threats, I would go to the state
legislature to establish a law enabling the state treasurer to
establish a federal tax escrow account. All Louisiana citizens
and businesses with federal tax obligations would be required
by law to make those payments to Louisiana's federal tax
escrow account. From that account, Louisiana citizens' federal
obligations (income, profit and excise taxes) would periodically
be sent to Washington.

Then I'd send Congress another letter, informing them that if
they retaliate against Louisiana citizens for obeying the
Constitution by cutting off, say, $10 billion worth of Medicaid
reimbursements or highway construction funds, we're simply
going to reduce by $10 billion our periodic payments of tax
obligations to Washington.

You say, "Hey, Williams, things could get pretty nasty after
that!" You're right and Congress might use armed force.
"Governor" Williams would ask Louisianians just how far they
are willing to go and what they're willing to sacrifice to protect
those precious rights the Framers sought to guarantee by our
Constitution.

You say, "Williams, have you lost your marbles, challenging a
powerful federal government?" I haven't lost my marbles any
more than James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, George
Washington and others lost theirs. After all, in 1776 -- when our
Founders handed King George III the Declaration of
Independence -- Great Britain was the mightiest power on the
face of the earth. They knew that if they lost they'd be hung as
traitors.

Of course, all of this would be irrelevant if Congress, the White
House and the Supreme Court followed their oaths of office to
"protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Walter E. Williams is the John M. Olin Distinguished Professor
of Economics at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va.



To: John Hunt who wrote (36768)7/7/1999 9:06:00 AM
From: Enigma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116790
 
Perhaps - but how do you account for the rapid acceleration in lease rates? - something else is afoot IMO. I'm trying to think through the possibility of massive replacement of old leases with new. In other words, leasing the same quantity of gold to repay an existing gold loan. The same # of ounces would result in a lower $ exposure and lease payout - but the risk of gold going up from here is greater. I don't know if anyone here has any experience of this from the leasing institution's side of things? d



To: John Hunt who wrote (36768)7/7/1999 10:09:00 AM
From: lorne  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116790
 
UK GOVT DISMISSES GOLD MKT CONSPIRACY THEORY AS "WILD FANTASY"
London--Jul 7--The UK government today dismissed as "wild fantasy" gold
market rumors that the UK was timing its gold auctions to help speculative short
sellers. Some of the largest gold producers in the world wrote to UK Prime
Minister Tony Blair this week asking him to investigate the conspiracy theories,
but today a Treasury spokesman said, though it would answer the letters, there
would be no investigation. (Story .13027)

AUS' NORMANDY: GOLD PRICE SLUMP AFTER UK SALE SHOWS IGNORANCE
Sydney--Jul 7--A further slump in the gold price overnight after the Bank of
England's first gold auction reveals the extent of ignorance in the market about
supply and demand conditions underpinning trade, Robert Champion de Crespigny,
executive chairman of Australia's biggest gold producer, Normandy Mining Ltd.,
said today. (Story .22276)

REPEATS: MITSUI: "SUSPICIOUSLY INFLATED NUMBER" UK GOLD BIDS
London--Jul 6--The 4.174 million ounces worth of bids--or 5.2 times the
offering--for gold received by the Bank of England is "a vastly, suspiciously
inflated number," according to Mitsui Bussan analyst Andy Smith. He said gold
auction bids above the BOE's lowest accepted price of US $261.20 per ounce
probably amounted to less than a fifth of the total bids. (Story .12057)

TAIWAN JUN GOLD IMPORTS 6.677 TONNES VS 4.098 TONNES IN JUN '98
Taipei--Jul 7--Taiwan's gold imports totaled 6.677 tonnes in June, compared
with 4.098 tonnes a year earlier, a statement released by the Ministry of
Finance said today. (Story .6016)
crbindex.com