SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Cents and Sensibility - Kimberly and Friends' Consortium -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sojourner Smith who wrote (10920)7/7/1999 1:28:00 PM
From: interesting man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108040
 
>Remember the promoters took SNMM from sub $1 to plus $20,

Promoters didnt take up SNMM, great fundamentals did!



To: Sojourner Smith who wrote (10920)7/7/1999 1:41:00 PM
From: vagabond  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108040
 
Sojourner -- I don't mean to speak for Kimberly by any means, and maybe she'll want to clarify her remarks herself. But I personally didn't consider her OGPS post to be a "bashing" of the stock itself -- simply an observation that it had been run-up by promoters, and that she'd taken advantage of it. Which I might've done, too, if I'd had the chance -- if only in hopes of buying-back-in at lower levels.

Any thoughts about the LONG-term worth of OGPS, Kimberly? -- or have you seen it strictly as a short-term play?,,...

Vagabond



To: Sojourner Smith who wrote (10920)7/7/1999 1:48:00 PM
From: Helen Krukas  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108040
 
Sojourner I agree that it is tacky-especially since she then buys it back when people sell. BTW she refers to the newsletters as P&Ds. I think you can call that bashing.