Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Cents and Sensibility - Kimberly and Friends' Consortium -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Helen Krukas who wrote (10936)	7/7/1999 2:21:00 PM
From: KevinMark	Respond to of 108040

ADCM....volume picking up. Should be a nice bounce based on chart.

To: Helen Krukas who wrote (10936)	7/7/1999 2:22:00 PM
From: $Mogul	Respond to of 108040

Please don't bash Kimberly, I respect her very much!! She is one of the most profitable stock pickers on SI. Kimberly usually takes profits, and I can NEVER blame her for that. I have followed her for about a year now, and I adore her and her stock picks. I am in OGPS, and I did not take profits. I think OGPS is at least a 3 bagger...but then again one never knows. $Mogul

To: Helen Krukas who wrote (10936)	7/7/1999 2:45:00 PM
From: vagabond	Respond to of 108040

Helen/Sojourner -- I'll make this my final word on this subject, and hope we don't get bogged-down in it too much further... It's possible I've overlooked something -- but based on my own notes and a quick look-back through the thread, as best I can tell Kimberly first mentioned buying OGPS back on June 28th at 1-1/16. I don't find her even mentioning it again until this morning when she said she'd sold for a profit yesterday -- and at the time of that post, the stock was ALREADY way-down from Tuesday's highs. So even with a stretch of the imagination, I don't see how one could think she'd started "a rush out the door" -- the selling was already well-underway before she even mentioned her own action. For that matter, it would've been fine with me (preferable, actually) if she HAD mentioned it yesterday so people here could've known her thinking and factored it into their own calculations. Kimberly has NEVER pumped-or-dumped ANY stock -- she just lets us know what SHE thinks might be good plays, and then the rest of us take responsibility for our own subsequent decisions. Okay, I'll shut up now... Vagabond

To: Helen Krukas who wrote (10936)	7/7/1999 2:59:00 PM
From: Kimberly Lee	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 108040

Helen, let me clarify. OGPS the company itself is real and definitely not a P&D, but its rise yesterday to 1 1/2 was a direct consequence of 2 newsletters' P&D operation. It's only prudent to take some profit off the table since I knew the stock would fall after the newsletters and their friends left. This way I can save my firepower to buy back more stock at a lower price to support it.

To: Helen Krukas who wrote (10936)	7/7/1999 3:14:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Respond to of 108040

Helen ... sorry just now catching up on my reading. I do not believe Kim meant OGPS was a P7D stock for it is a rela company. But there are forces on the internet that if you are savvy you take advantage of those forces. You have nays that have an agenda and newsletters that have one which is a P & D. OGPS was touted by two news letters and those are what she is refering to as the P & D. OGPS got shorted to .875 and then right back up ... Next came the news letters. All she did was capitalize on it before they did. I BTS is where you sell and get out your intial whereever you feel and then support it at the new floor when the P & D are gone and the stock stablizes. This is a system most use. Each run you make your initial and each fall you support it getting more shares. About the third roll you are kicking some serious profits in. Hope this helps. GB