Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IDT *(idtc) following this new issue?* -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yamakita who wrote (10737)	7/7/1999 10:34:00 PM
From: Madharry	Respond to of 30916

I was skeptical when the issue came up with CUBE re Greenberg but it subsequently turned out that he did have a cozy relationship with David ROcker and he quoted him in subsequent columns. The timing of that release and this one are just too similar to be co-incidental to my way of thinking and the first sentence of his article implied that IDTC had filed fraudulent papers with the SEC. This was not borne out by what he subsequently wrote. I refuse to believe that he is so incompetent a writer that he did this inadvertantly. This is a viciously slanted article which transgresses the boundaries of fair minded investigative financial reporting. If he was trying to be fair he should have spoken to the CPAs and to the investment bankers himself. My guess is someone did this work for him and he signed his name to it.

To: Yamakita who wrote (10737)	7/7/1999 10:40:00 PM
From: HiwayTrader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30916

Don't be naive please... If you don't believe in conspiracies than you should not be trading in the market. Read the papers - the market is not forgiving to those who are ignorant of the historical facts. In this case, the HG story was just not credible. A real giveaway was the ridiculous attempt at saving himself with the 'a' or 'o' line. Along with the timing, that made the entire story suspect. Can we believe that companies like AOL and GE did not find any of this in their DD? This was nothing more than a flash in the pan for the shorts, and a shakeout of scared money. Thats ok with me - opportunity knocked.