Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bruce Robbins who wrote (2918)	7/7/1999 10:46:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4504

Hello mon ami, Welcome back. Thanks for the clarification.

To: Bruce Robbins who wrote (2918)	7/9/1999 3:32:00 AM
From: Jeff Dickson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4504

Bruce, What sort of density difference would one expect between the dike and the sulphides? Don't mafic igenous rocks cause difficulties in interpreting gravity surveys? I'm wondering if the oblong shape of the gravity anaomoly is due to the dike, which conspicuously was found right in the middle of the major axis. Also from that survey, doesn't it suggest that the dike isn't that large, since the gravity equipotentials fall off quickly off-axis? Thanks for any insight. -jeff