Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The 56 Point TA; Charts With an Attitude -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Warthog who wrote (30827)	7/8/1999 3:06:00 AM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 79260

Wart, There are at least 3 versions of the HA scan floating around. All are approved. It's a semi-elusive formation so I sprinkled some voo across a semi-wide area. Doug R

To: Warthog who wrote (30827)	7/8/1999 11:39:00 AM
From: wittder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 79260

warthog, I looked at it closer, How are you calculating day 1.(From open to close? or prev close to close? or low to hi for the day?)I believe that small gap has something to do with EDMC. // 5-8% move day 1 if close(md1) >= (close(md1-1)1.05) then if close(md1) <= (close(md1-1)1.08) then <For GBIX I get more than a 6% HA move.> //6% max ha move ( the close or lows?? ) if close(md1+3) <= (1.06* close(md1+2))(woops md1+2 should this be md1+1) <CNCX I don't have higher lows> The scan is looking for higher lows and not higher closes.(Doug any comments?) Thanx, for your keen eye, wittder