Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : GoTo.com, promising Internet search engine -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (305)	7/8/1999 9:07:00 AM
From: Vendit™	Respond to of 977

GOTO's closing (1 minute charts) 5-3-3-stochastics....... ask01.wwquote.com

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (305)	7/8/1999 9:26:00 AM
From: Vendit™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 977

GOTO up $2 in pro open))

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (305)	7/8/1999 9:38:00 AM
From: Mike Fredericks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 977

Sorry, but I don't understand this paragraph: If GOTO closes lower then it is a good sign. -3 or so would be good indicating that it is cooling its heels prior to another runup. Today is especially significant since it is widely expected that there will be profit taking after YHOO's earnings. If GOTO resists and closes down 3 or so, that would signal a good future. If the nets as a whole are up today because of YHOO's earnings (YHOO was up 6 or 7 in aftermarket yesterday) and GOTO is down, to me that's not good. The rising tide of the 'net stocks should lift GOTO and if GOTO fights that trend, it's bad. (If all nets are down, different story). When you say "it's widely expected that there will be profit taking..." I'm assuming you mean that it's widely expected that the nets will close down today. Assume there is profit taking and the stocks close down a bit, why would GOTO closing down 3 be "resisting?" I think I disagree with you that there will be profit taking across the board, but regardless of whether I agree/disagree I don't think I understand that paragraph. If you could explain, I'd appreciate. Thanks, -Mike