Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WAVX Anyone? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pluvia who wrote (8010)	7/8/1999 11:15:00 AM
From: Norman Klein	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11417

Can you post the text from the Barron's article I would ask you to post the URL, but it probably requires that you have an account with Barron's and I am tired of constantly supplying all of my personal information (one of the main reasons that I like WAVX's Embassy chip) in order to read a single article. Now some of you may claim that by posting an article that I am infringing on Barron's property rights. But this article appears to be infringing on my life, so I have no qualms about viewing it.

To: Pluvia who wrote (8010)	7/8/1999 11:54:00 AM
From: Wooly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11417

Pluvia, YOU have ignored repeated requests to support YOUR OWN rubbish in POST #7641. You said: >>"Their product "idea" faces significant competition by MAJOR players - all of whom significantly undercut WAVX's pricing and none of whom have made their own product profitable. The concept is a failure in the marketplace..."<< Defend your own statements, Pluvia. Who are these MAJOR players you cite, and what are these mystery products that you claim have undercut WAVX's pricing? You are the source of this hot air. Impress us with your awesome research. Claugus's flatulent drivel has been deflated several times already. You just look silly trying to hide in his gas. Cheers, Wooly

To: Pluvia who wrote (8010)	7/9/1999 2:13:00 AM
From: Jenna	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 11417

Pluvia, I have read Barron's for 5 years and have yet to see anything long term harm come to any stock. They were down on AMZN, YHOO, AOL, GM, WSM, and scores of others. What they want is to have the 'conservative majority' back into their favorite blue chips thereby getting them out of the risky albeit highly profitable newly established, exciting companies. If you read this guys 'picks' list you have to just cringe. Your attacks on this stock I hope will come back and kick you where it hurts.. I have spent literally hours researching this and other 'highly bashed shorts' and have yet to find any credence to the vehemence of your attacks. Although I am not an 'investor' in any stock (not even IBM, CSCO or the likes) I regard attacks of this nature as solely a contrived plan to keep the stock down at all costs for a personal agenda. I short stocks and so do scores of my trader friends, but not with the utter malevolance you exhibit... and never bashing them in the process. I guess we are to admire your 'concern' for the poor souls getting stuck in this stock, and of course you have nothing at stake like perhaps your own short position, but just looking out for others.. like truth, justice and the American Way (or your bottom line which is closer to the truth).. "tankage of WAVX" since article in Barron DATE CLOSING PRICE OPEN HIGH LOW VOLUME -------- ------------- -------- -------- -------- ----------- 7/09/1999 15 9/16 7/08/1999 15 9/16 15 3/16 15 3/4 14 1/2 701,000 7/07/1999 15 1/4 16 16 14 11/16 1,067,900 7/06/1999 16 16 3/16 16 7/8 15 3/4 16,855