SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Any Vietnam Vets on Silicon Investor? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: William Brotherson who wrote (7)7/8/1999 4:09:00 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19
 
Hmmm... I thought the reason Fonda could not be prosecuted was that Congress neglected to declare war on N. Vietnam- -because the Prexy, good old LBJ (may his soul rot in Hell) neglected to ask it to.

Treason is defined in the Constitution:

ARTICLE III
Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.

My understanding is that, because Congress never declared war, N. Vietnam was not legally an enemy, and therefore Fonda (or anyone else) could not legally commit treason.

Other than that minor quibble, yes, she commited treason.



To: William Brotherson who wrote (7)7/10/1999 10:17:00 AM
From: Bread Upon The Water  Respond to of 19
 
WB.

It is my understanding that in order for a nation to be categorized as an "enemy" we have to be war with them, and since this was never a "war" that was declared by congress this section of the USC is not applicable.

Not mad either,

Bill