SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: codawg who wrote (25711)7/8/1999 1:45:00 PM
From: Spartex  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
OT--

<<NOVLs recent success has been due to a focus on their own strengths, not an attempt
to beat MSFT at their game. My points in the previous message are not meant to be
biased. It's a question of risk vs. reward. I wanted to point out that you will always get
better upside performance in higher risk company that performs well (NOVL) than you
will in a lower risk company that performs well (MSFT).>>

I completely agree with these comments. Right on, as Schmidt is positioning NOVL in its niche of strength (not just applications on the NOS, but applications on NDS), and what I foresee as a sector of strong growth. Thanks. I'm just curious though, you've taken what I consider a high risk to leave a position of steady income, and become a "trader" for a living. Not that it won't result in better upside performance, but I'm curious why you don't consider a bet on NOVL a worthy risk. I'm not saying its a screaming buy here at $29, but in the single digits and low teens, the company Schmidt was building had overwhelming value IMHO. Either way, I have the patience to let what appeared to be a high risk bet 18 months ago (with $3 in cash, a visionary CEO, I was buying in the $7s, as objective risk analysis said this was a bird's nest on the ground, minimal downside, strong upside potential), growth into a long term, lower risk and higher performance investment. We'll see. I'm looking forward to the future. Regards, QuadK



To: codawg who wrote (25711)7/9/1999 12:38:00 AM
From: ed  Respond to of 74651
 
Well, if you compare NOVL and MSFT on a long term base, say 10 years, you will see the difference. For a $1 stock jump to $2 is 100%, but for a $100 stock jumping by $50 is only 50% , but the risk factor is quite different !!!!