Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (12942)	7/8/1999 4:00:00 PM
From: Eli74	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

To All: The issue of whether or not VLNC has been added to the index, or when index managers have to balance to the index, or who was selling/buying late/early/middle of the session is largely irrelevant in the grander scheme of things. What is relevant, in my opinion, is the extent to which VLNC is able to make headway in finally being able to produce a product and then selling that product to OEMs. Everything else is just window dressing. At least in my humble opinion.

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (12942)	7/8/1999 4:11:00 PM
From: Pallisard	Respond to of 27311

The WSJ is affiliated with Barrons isn't it. After reading the dis-information in Barrons this year, I wouldn't trust the info coming out of either publication. It's skewed to fit their prespective something like SEC filings. He was probably mis-quoted or only "half-quoted" by the reporter who forgot to enumerate the exceptions to that rule. It would be a burden on a fund to absolutely insist they buy their quota all in a few days, making them pay higher prices because of the influx of sudden buy orders. Doesn't make sense.