Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Howard C. who wrote (46130)	7/8/1999 4:18:00 PM
From: MR. FISH	Respond to of 50264

Well said Howard, well said and I am with you as I stated earlier I think it is time to force Digitcom's hand good or bad. We have all invested here knowing the potential up and downside. I am still flying with the up theory as bleak as things may look. If no good news comes out of this we know what will happen. If we are clean and the stock drops anyway I will be there to add to my position. Fishie

To: Howard C. who wrote (46130)	7/8/1999 4:28:00 PM
From: Midnightsun	Respond to of 50264

Even though things look a little darker today than yesterday, I don't think it is the end of the world. This is the second stock that I own that has been suspended from trading. The first stock was suspected of inner wrong doings. This was several months ago and has since regained trading rights. The day trading was resumed was somewhat surprising because after an initial drop in price everything got back to normal. That is not to say that DGIV will react the same way but it does demonstrate that suspension by the SEC does not mean the end of the stock. After all the research done on this stock it would seem that it is for real. I now believe that "talk" about contracts and the future of the company without factual proof of such contracts and or earnings, etc. and probably complaints by individuals to the SEC caused the suspension. The recent spike in volume and increase in price was really not that great when compared to the runup of last year. Governmental departments move slowly but it seems that if they had proof of wrong doings they would have acted much sooner in order to protect other investors......

To: Howard C. who wrote (46130)	7/8/1999 4:52:00 PM
From: Sam Lee	Respond to of 50264

I just looked at insider sales on Yahoo. No sales are shown.

To: Howard C. who wrote (46130)	7/8/1999 5:00:00 PM
From: Lazarus Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

One heckuva post Howard! And no "dry wit" or "irony" disclaimers either! WHOA! I think what you said bears repeating... just a couple of thoughts...I think the SEC acts in what it perceives to be the public interest...the requirement for the Rule 15c2-11 before trading is good, because that will force financials to be filed...no more excuses...we, the investors, deserve that information...if it's acceptable, great, we move on, if it's not, please, let's find out and get this thing over with, no? Why now? I don't know. Maybe the volume. Maybe that TV appearance by Jimmy making claims with no backup ("we are the ONLY worldwide IP network providor")...who knows?... I too have grown tired with the cat and mouse games being played by the executives of this company with regard to information. Though I must say, my attitude has been somewhat more fatalistic than yours in that I had accepted that there was no way that we as shareholders (not having a majority of the voting stock) could effect how DGIV was going about their business... [Note: I know that there can be plenty of discussion about that last statement, but it is not the point I am trying to make...] Anyway, I think you have found the silver lining behind this cloud. If the SEC forces information to be brought public, we can then make informed decisions about what we want to do with our little piece of the DGIV pie. Lazarus