Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IDT *(idtc) following this new issue?* -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter O'Brien who wrote (10852)	7/8/1999 4:10:00 PM
From: socrates2	Respond to of 30916

If those so-called professional market analysts truly understood market, they wouldn't waste their time by writing the damn articles to make their living. If I remember correctly, one of the street.com founders didn't even have a bed in his shared room before he started to get some quick money by fooling people in his street.com. He would have been rich already had he known market as he pretended. He actually still sleeps on floor because he knows that street.com is not able to fool people forever. He got to save money now. Unfortunately, many of innocent people keep being fooled by them, let them get rich. I never read those craps. I don't know what they write on IDTC and don't want to know. What I did today is doubled my holding at 20.

To: Peter O'Brien who wrote (10852)	7/8/1999 4:13:00 PM
From: Tibor	Respond to of 30916

What is your take on the day? Volume of 2.9m shares and a drop of 1 3/8. 20 held rock solid. Somebody was buying anything available between 20-20 1/4.

To: Peter O'Brien who wrote (10852)	7/8/1999 4:14:00 PM
From: Hawaii60	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 30916

Would somebody who subscribes to thestreet.com please post the full text of the latest story entitled (readers rake Herb Greenberg over the coals for IDT story ) Thank you. I will not sign up.

To: Peter O'Brien who wrote (10852)	7/8/1999 4:36:00 PM
From: wl9839	Respond to of 30916

I read the description. Although it does disclose then outstanding amount, interest rate, etc., it still does not fully disclose the purpose of the loan, the relationship of the parties-i.e. all the "insider bad things" that H Greenberg was alluding to. Again, it would be helpful for the company to be a little more forthcoming with the shareholders. I am quite sure that the banks extending the $150 million facility were provided with all this info as well as copies of the documentation. If they're entitled to this, why not us the owners?