SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (44550)7/8/1999 6:19:00 PM
From: jbe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Oh, come on, Ish...How could a man who "got the kids" be expected to pay child support to an ex-wife who did NOT get the kids? Support for what?




To: Ish who wrote (44550)7/8/1999 6:40:00 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I couldn't
believe he couldn't appeal but it was a small county where a few ruled.

But appeals go to the state level. And you always have one right of appeal automatically.

I, like jbe, found it hard to believe that he would get the kids and have to pay child support. I would have to see the actual orders before I would believe that.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News