Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mr. Pink's Picks: selected event-driven value investments -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Phil(bullrider) who wrote (10711)	7/8/1999 6:21:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18998

LG had a problem with me because I went back and edited a post after deciding that what I said wasn't fair. In the meantime, he copied what I chose to edit out, and wrote a quick objection to it. He posted that, and I stated that he was responding to a non-existent statement. He then accused me of being 'disingenuous' because I had chosen to edit my post. He seemed to be trying to say that I had edited in response to him, so I pointed out that the edit window had closed by the time he posted his objection. He then seemed to place a great deal of importance on when he had copied it, as if I were supposed to know what he was doing. He also made a to do about how long it took him to compose his three sentence response. My opinion is that he purposefully waited until the edit window had closed, and was embarrassed because he didn't bother to make sure that the post was intact. Of course it was even more ridiculous because I actually agreed with his objection to what I had initially posted, which was why I edited it out. He seems to think editing my post after he copied it made me dishonest. So go the days of our SI, Barb