SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (44553)7/8/1999 7:07:00 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Two weeks later she married the judge. You must have missed that.

Which would have made reversal on appeal virtually automatic. The appearance of fairness would have been so obvious that no appellate court would let it stand.

Frankly, until I see the actual orders, I'm thinking this is urban myth territory.



To: Ish who wrote (44553)7/8/1999 7:15:00 PM
From: jbe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I agree with Christopher. And I would suggest that not only would reversal on appeal be automatic, but also that the judge just might have to worry about keeping his judgeship.

Joan


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News