SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Richard Wang who wrote (64499)7/9/1999 9:53:00 AM
From: Gary Ng  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583791
 
Richard, Re: On the other hand, AMD may want to play Intel's game, introducing higher speeds only when Intel almost catches up

And watch itself bleeding to death ?

Gary



To: Richard Wang who wrote (64499)7/9/1999 11:33:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583791
 
RE:"On the other hand, AMD may want to play Intel's game, introducing
higher speeds only when Intel almost catches up."...

I see three trends developing.
1.AMD toying with Intel on the speed grades. Always staying a grade or two ahead.
2. Intel counters by saying MHZ really doesn't matter...too many other factors. Bandwith. etc.
3. Intel taking the "Cyrix line"...defending the P-III/Celeron by saying that Integer is what really counts and very few programs utiliize the FPU, except mutant alien blasters...

Of course Intel used all this to hype their chips before...which will make it all amusing.




To: Richard Wang who wrote (64499)7/9/1999 1:29:00 PM
From: Steve Porter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583791
 
Richard,

I expect AMD to release the fastest chips as soon as there is enough volume of them, and they mix has shifted to the majority in the higher bin (i.e. not realease a 700mhz chip while yeilding mostly 600mhz and killing the price on the 600mhz).

Steve