Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Energy Conversion Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ray who wrote (3809)	7/9/1999 1:45:00 PM
From: Frank Haims	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8393

Ray Thats what I thought too. It is significant but requires a source of H2 to fill the tank. Seems a lot simpler than a moving reformer.

To: Ray who wrote (3809)	7/10/1999 3:56:00 PM
From: Sid Turtlman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8393

Ray:" a ten gallon methanol tank would likely be sufficient for methanol-reformer/fuel-cell autos." I think you might need a much bigger tank for a fuel cell car to have comparable range as an i.c.e. car. Methanol has about half the energy per gallon as gasoline. FC engines in theory should be more efficient than an i.c.e, but when you consider the energy cost of operating the reformer, and to a lesser extent the extra weight of the water tank needed to provide steam for reforming and to keep the fc membrane moist, I doubt whether the net efficiency will be even twice that of an i.c.e. car. If it does make it to twice, then you would need a 15-18 gallon methanol tank, same size as a conventional car, to get the same range, as the low energy content of the fuel counteracts the high efficiency of the fc engine.