SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PHILLIP FLOTOW who wrote (3946)7/9/1999 3:53:00 PM
From: Peter Bourgeois  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7235
 
Hello Vaughn, Shaw and Phillip,

Good one Vaughn, excellent verses. In addition to being an excellent detective, you are a great poet.

Shaw I guess we have to believe that they are as concerned about the share price as we are, since we have no other choice.

Phillip, that may be part of the reason SUF has been so quiet. Especially if DeBeers is holding back funds. Personally, I hope that SA sticks to their guns, even if it means that some funds to SUF are delayed a bit. I think that it is high time that DeBeers gets raked over the coals.

Cheers !!! Peter



To: PHILLIP FLOTOW who wrote (3946)7/10/1999 6:18:00 AM
From: Bob Fairchild  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7235
 
If these remaining 25% of the diamonds are valuated and found
to be grossly undervalued by DeBeers, will Southern Era have
any legal recourse to compensation from DeBeers for basically
being underpaid for their diamonds or because De Beers sets the
price is Southern Era forced to accept this ? If this question was
answered in an earlier post, sorry, but hard to keep up with all
the reading sometimes.

Bob


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News