Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (64546)	7/9/1999 5:07:00 PM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1586575

Scumbria- <CB is going to have some explaining to do!> How do you figure? Although I don't know the Intel numbers for Q2, intel did not feel it necessary to pre-announce, which usually means the Q should come close to Intel's guidance. Oh yeah, you don't do the accounting thing, as all of your arguments are qualitative. PB

To: Scumbria who wrote (64546)	7/9/1999 5:58:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1586575

SCUMbria - Re: "When one of the most profitable companies in the world falls off the performance curve behind a nearly lifeless competitor, I call that self-destruction. " Last I looked, Intel was shipping tons of 550 MHz Pentium IIIs and AMD had only a few 475 MHz Kmart 62's for sale - plus a few 600 MHz LaughALON foils. Re: " Intel has intentionally lowered their own ASPs to magnify the effects of their failure. CB is going to have some explaining to do!" Why don't we compare next Tuesday's Intel Confeernce Call with next Wednesday's AMD funeral call - OK ? Paul