Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CheckFree Holdings Corp. (CKFR), the next Dell, Intel? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TLindt who wrote (7879)	7/9/1999 6:43:00 PM
From: Rob C.	Respond to of 20297

TL, I would imagine that financially Pete will be fine. I would think that once the portals start coming online and subscriber growth accelerates Checkfree will be trading back in the 50's, that is if Checkfree is still independant. Checkfree hasn't lost its dominant position, in fact IMO it has made more progress than many of us ever imagined in a very short period of time. Regards, Rob

To: TLindt who wrote (7879)	7/9/1999 11:15:00 PM
From: AugustWest	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 20297

>>, in I way I feel sorry for Pete Kight that he can't experience some of this wild action out here like some of us...failed secondary and such. It's too bad in a way. You forget, he still gets a salary from his job, regardless of the ROI for shareholders. Now, I know, he has a strong interest in seeing the market cap. increase, but let's face it, you think he's up right now concerned about the stock price? I'm sure he hopes it's ten fold by this time next year, but in reality, why should I have more than say 10% of my portfolio invested in CKFR? Why do I keep getting this feeling that everyone and his brother is using CheckFree as a cheap date?