SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E. Davies who wrote (12219)7/9/1999 8:33:00 PM
From: E. Davies  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 29970
 
Excite@home has a "petition" of sorts they are trying to get sent to the SF board of supervisors. I think they have done a very good job of grasping the basic emotional aspect of "open" access. Here are the words:

home.net


People of San Francisco, Let Your Voice Be Heard!

Fight Unnecessary Government Regulation of the Internet!

Don't Let Affordable, High-Speed Internet Access Pass You By!

America Online (AOL) and its band of million-dollar lobbyists are pressuring San Francisco officials into taking affordable, high-speed Internet access away from you. AOL claims to be a champion of consumer choice when, in truth, they want to use government regulation to tighten their hold on you and rest of the Internet community.

Don't let them do it!

Show your support for affordable, high-speed Internet access and a government-free Internet. Please read, sign, and send the letter below. It will be emailed directly to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.

Do your part to ensure San Francisco remains a technology leader well into the 21st Century!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Supervisor,

I believe that Internet competition benefits all California consumers.

I believe that the Internet has succeeded because of free enterprise, innovation, and the absence of government regulation.

I believe that no government organization should be allowed to impede, delay, or deny my access to the best Internet technologies available.

I believe in promoting a competitive Internet environment where companies and entrepreneurs are encouraged to invest in new technology, and where success is determined only by the limitations of one's merits and free-enterprise.

I believe that federal, state, and local governments should not pass laws designed to subsidize or protect some Internet competitors at the expense of others.

I believe that a free and open Internet will maximize the benefits for consumers, producing more choice, increase speed, and lower prices

I believe that government should not pick winners and losers in the competitive Internet environment. The history of the Internet is rooted in open competition, creativity, and innovation.

Please don't regulate our Internet.



To: E. Davies who wrote (12219)7/10/1999 11:08:00 AM
From: art slott  Respond to of 29970
 


Digital Customers $pend More on Cable Bills
Gartner study shows choice, movies and quality drive customers' choices


By Alan Breznick
While only in 2 million homes so far, digital cable is already making its presence felt, according to the latest consumer study.

The new study of 524 households, conducted in May by GartnerGroup's Dataquest division, found that digital cable subscribers are spending far more on their cable bills each month than other cable customers. Digital cable households are laying out an average of $57.70 a month for their service, as opposed to $41.10 a month for analog cable subscribers interested in moving up to digital and just $36.50 a month for ordinary cable customers with little or no interest in upgrading.

In particular, the study revealed, digital cable subscribers are spending heavily on premium movie channels and pay-per-view (PPV) events. About 80% of digital cable homes take at least one pay movie channel, as opposed to just 32% of cable subs with little interest in digital. Some 72% of digital cable subs have sampled PPV, in contrast to just 25% of those averse to digital.

Moreover, digital cable subscribers watch a whopping 130% more premium movies than average cable subs. Even those considering the switch to digital view 45% more premium films than average cable customers.

"The business model for digital TV continues to be increased buy rates for movies," said Harry Hoyle, VP-research for Dataquest. The prospect of increased video entertainment, he said, is "a tremendously powerful purchase motivator" for consumers.

But, unlike the digital satellite TV business, digital cable is not yet cutting into the lucrative video rental market. The study found that digital cable subscribers still rent an average of 2.7 videos a month, about the same as analog cable customers interested in switching to digital.

Mark Snowden, a Dataquest senior analyst, pointed out that digital cable, for all its increased program offerings, still can't match the PPV smorgasbord of satellite TV. He noted that the DBS providers, especially DirecTV Inc., provide a "much broader array" of PPV programs.

Similar to surveys of DBS customers, the Dataquest study found that increased choice is the biggest reason for taking digital cable. About 60% of digital customers rated more choice as their primary factor for subscribing, as opposed to 12% crediting clearer picture and sound and 9% citing overall value.

A scant fraction of survey respondents, or 3%, attributed their digital plunge to a greater number of sports networks. But those primarily interested in more sports showed a strong willingness to pay extra for the action, particularly pro football.

Not surprisingly, digital cable subscribers generally watch a great deal more TV than average cable customers. Digital households especially tune into more dramatic, family and children's programs than average cable homes.

But digital cable subs watch less broadcast TV and basic cable than their average cable counterparts. They also view fewer newsmagazine shows than average cable subs and, thanks to their advanced electronic program guides, use printed TV listings far less often.

In addition, the study revealed, digital cable customers are generally spending much less time than before playing video games and listening to music on the radio, CDs or cassettes. However, while 17% are spending less time on the Internet, slightly more, or 22%, are actually going on the Web for longer stretches.

Dataquest researchers saw a sizable range of interest among digital cable subs in such emerging interactive TV services as electronic mail, Web surfing and home shopping. This could bode well for such existing or proposed interactive services as WebTV, Wink, WorldGate, ACTV, AOL TV and U S West's WebVision.

But few digital subs showed much enthusiasm for actually paying for these services, no matter how convenient they seem to be. As a result, Snowden and Hoyle predicted that interactive services will have to piggyback onto entertainment services to get into consumers' homes.

"We're very bullish on the prospect of people using interactive services over time," Snowden said. "The problem is that people won't pay for them."

Similarly, digital cable subs indicated great interest in the new breed of personal video recorders (PVRs), which permit viewers to pause and rewind TV shows in progress and store programs much easier than conventional VCRs. That's promising news for companies like TiVo Inc. and Replay Networks Inc., which are starting to market such devices.

But interest dropped sharply once survey respondents considered the $500 and higher prices that TiVo and Replay are charging for their standalone set-top boxes. Digital subs expressed far more willingness to spend perhaps $10 a month for a PVR service bundled into a cable or satellite TV set-top, much as EchoStar Communications Corp. plans to launch with WebTV Networks this fall.

(July 5, 1999)

More Cable World