SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Digital Island,Inc - (Nasdaq- ISLD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Matt Brown who wrote (95)7/9/1999 11:19:00 PM
From: 2MAR$  Respond to of 1884
 
Thanks FM, Think i see nothing but legs on this pony, ISLD!

was also temtpted to buy more, too. Trading and slightly drifting, but nicely , some great news over the weekend, and were right back skywards, anytime!

:-))

2MAR$



To: Matt Brown who wrote (95)7/10/1999 1:33:00 AM
From: djane  Respond to of 1884
 
**Nice 7/5/99 tele.com article on ISLD and content delivery network (CDN) services.
[Note: $2.3B CDN and $14B web hosting market opportunities in 2002-2003 -- I'd wager that $250M ISLD revenues in a couple years is conservative. djane]

teledotcom.com

NetWorkings

Special Delivery

By Greg Howard. Greg Howard is principal analyst at the
HTRC Group (San Jose, Calif.). He can be reached at
greg.howard@htrcgroup.com.

When it comes to getting Internet users to visit and use a
company's Web site, it's all in the delivery. Sure, great online
content is critical. But what good is content if users don't want
it because they have to wait forever for it to travel the
congested pathways of the Internet? A new type of service
provider, however, has stepped in with a solution: content
delivery network (CDN) services.

CDNs distribute content globally on a network through
strategically placed servers that store content close to users,
which can speed up delivery by as much as 50 percent.
Although CDN providers are few today, their number should
rise to more than 30 over the next three years, as the market
grows from $63 million in 1999 to $2.3 billion in 2002.
[ISLD has a nice head start...]

Some content providers are already looking to CDN
providers to avoid capital expenses for building out capacity
for a self-hosted site or for a one-time Internet event, such as
the Victoria's Secret fashion show. By using a CDN service, a
content provider might need to maintain only a fraction of the
bandwidth it would otherwise require. If a content provider
finds it needs the capacity of two T3 (90 Mbit/s) lines for its
site, it may have to lease only a fractional T3 if it uses a CDN
service. The content provider pays the CDN provider only for
the bandwidth it uses, instead of having to: (1) provision new
T3 lines; (2) purchase additional routers, load balancers and
bandwidth optimization products; and (3) hire new
administrators to maintain additional data connections and a
complex network.

Two approaches currently exist for delivering CDN services:
facilities-based and non-facilities-based. A facilities-based
service provider, such as Digital Island, uses its own
worldwide network to deliver CDN services. Because it owns
and operates the network, this type of provider can quickly
resolve network problems, as well as offer guarantees for
traffic it controls.


A non-facilities-based CDN service provider, such as
Sandpiper and Akamai, deploys its content delivery servers in
a number of other service providers' networks around the
world. One big advantage of deploying servers in many
individual networks, according to Scott Yara, vice president of
marketing at Sandpiper, is resiliency: If one service provider's
network experiences an outage, the CDN servers deployed in
the other networks automatically deliver more content to
compensate.

CDN service providers have begun to obtain key content
provider accounts. For example, Akamai delivers content for
CNN and Yahoo!, Sandpiper for MSNBC and Digital Island
for E*Trade. The largest factors driving the growth in demand
for CDN services are the increasing number of large Web
sites (those using 20 Mbit/s or more), currently estimated at
more than 3,000 and expected to double in 1999; growing
demand for speedy content by Internet users; the scarcity of
Web site management expertise; and the acceptance of new
CDN technology as it proves itself over the next 18 months.
Ironically, the growth in subscribers for new high-speed
Internet access services such as digital subscriber line (DSL),
cable modems and wireless broadband will ultimately increase
demand for CDN. As Web sites begin to offer more and more
bandwidth-intensive content, users will increasingly try to
access these sites.


This irony, however, isn't lost on CDN service providers,
which have servers ready to rush content to users wherever
they may be, while bandwidth demand grows 8 percent each
month and Internet traffic doubles two to three times a year.
Copyright © 1999 tele.com
All Rights Reserved.



To: Matt Brown who wrote (95)7/10/1999 1:07:00 PM
From: djane  Respond to of 1884
 
Interesting NYTimes article on IPOs and quiet periods [ISLD reference]





July 10, 1999

Internet Stock Offerings Are Quiet but for
the Shouting

By ANDY WANG

ome chatter on Wall Street this week disrupted what is customarily
a quiet period.

On Wednesday, Goldman, Sachs put the Network Plus Corporation, a
telecommunications company that offers high-speed data and Internet
services, on its recommended stock list with a price target of $30 a
share. Just a week earlier, Goldman Sachs had been the lead underwriter
of Network Plus's initial offering of common stock at $16 a share.

Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, a co-manager of the $128 million offering,
also started stock coverage of Network Plus on Wednesday with a buy
rating. With the plugs from Goldman Sachs and Donald, Lufkin &
Jenrette, shares of Network Plus gained $1.375 on the day to close at
$23.375; they have since slipped back to $21.813.

The announcements raised eyebrows among investors and Internet stock
analysts familiar with what is called the quiet period, the time before and
after a private company goes public in which it and its underwriters are
prohibited from hyping the stock under Federal securities law. The
period is intended to give the market time to find an appropriate price
level for the stock.

It turns out, though, that Network
Plus already had publicly traded debt
and had been filing reports with the
Securities and Exchange
Commission, meaning it is not really a
newly public company. Therefore,
Goldman Sachs was not prohibited from commenting on the stock.

A spokeswoman for Goldman said Network Plus is nine years old and
well known and that the transaction was closed before the
recommendation; Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette officials were unavailable
for comment on Friday. Still, the investment banks' actions surprised
even the professionals.

"This is very unusual," said Ben Holmes, who tracks new issues for
Ipopros.com. "Obviously, Goldman Sachs knows the rules, and they're
playing within them."

But the restrictions on quiet periods are quite fuzzy. And while many
companies and their underwriters refrain from saying anything publicly
during the time immediately preceding and following their offerings, more
companies are saying more than they have in the past. Internet companies
in particular are eager to provide business progress reports and to
continue announcing deals, something underscored by recent comments
from Goto.com, Stamps.com and Digital Island, among others. "It's going
to be tough for companies in the Internet to be quiet," said Tim Klein, a
research analyst at U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray. "Promotion is a big part
of the game. People are trying to build a brand."

The quiet period, based in Federal securities law, has never been
translated into a specific rule by the S.E.C. But it is commonly
understood to start when a company hires an underwriter and to end 25
days after the company's initial public offering.

"We haven't developed a commissioned definition," said John Heine, a
spokesman for the S.E.C., adding that staying quiet is "up to the
companies' lawyers or people who advise them."

Holding back just seems too much for many Internet companies, whose
stocks can swing wildly because of day traders' fervor for the sector and
the relatively thin trading in each company's stock.

Consider Goto.com, an Internet search service that went public on June
18. Twelve days later, the company announced that it had attracted more
than 10,000 advertisers, 80,000 affiliate Web sites and an estimated 10
million unique users. "The increasing level of enthusiastic participation in
the Goto.com marketplace by our advertisers, network affiliate sites and
loyal users clearly demonstrates the need for our service and our success
in delivering it," Jeffrey Brewer, the company's chief executive, said in a
statement. Stock of Goto.com, which went public at $15, rose more than
18 percent to $28 a share the day of the announcement.

The next day, the stock soared $8.50 more after the company
announced a strategic partnership with the Netscape Communications
Corporation. In both cases, the company issued statements to the press.
An official for the company said he could not comment on the stock's
price, which is now triple its offering price at $48.9375, because he was
bound by the quiet period surrounding the offering.

Steve Harmon, senior investment analyst for Internet.com., sees no
problem with Goto's action. "If you are an investor, I think you want to
know those numbers," he said. "I think that's newsworthy."

As for Network Plus, he said that a stock recommendation by the
company's underwriter should be taken with a grain of salt since it was
biased and that its timing, whether days or months later, should make no
difference to investors.

Another case in point is Stamps.com, an online postage company, which
went public for $11 a share on June 25. Six days later, Mysoftware
Company, a direct marketer, announced a partnership with Stamps.com.
"Partnering with a high-caliber company serving small business such as
Mysoftware Company is a phenomenal way for the Stamps.com service
to reach the small business market," John Payne, the chief executive
officer of Stamps.com, said in a statement. Stamps.com's stock climbed
50 percent, or $11.25, to $33.50 the next day and closed Friday just
under that level.

"It's absolutely a standard announcement," said Jeffrey Green, the
co-founder of the company and vice president of marketing. "We've
shown a clear history of making these types of announcements."

Three announcements in quick succession led to a near tripling of the
stock price of Digital Island, which provides network services. The day
after its public offering of $10 a share on June 29, the company
announced that it had secured Paymentnet Inc., a payment processing
service, as a customer. Digital Island's stock promptly rose $6.0625 to
$17.9375. Digital Island next announced a deal to distribute content to
Bidcom, an Internet resource for builders.

The stock gained $11.4375, to close at $32.6875 on Tuesday after that
news. Then Webspective Software announced a partnership with Digital
Island, which pushed Digital's stock up $1.0625 to $33.75 on
Wednesday. The shares closed the week at $26.25.

A spokesman for Digital Island said on Friday that legal advisers had told
him not to comment on the stock's movement because of the quiet
period. Heine of the S.E.C. said regulators would not comment on the
actions of specific companies.

Keith E. Benjamin, managing director and senior Internet analyst at
BancBoston Robertson Stephens, said the number of announcements
around initial public offerings could be traced to the heavy volume of
Internet stock issues.

"There are too many of them," Benjamin said. "It's very difficult to rise
above the clutter. That requires big news."

To be sure, companies can find the quiet period exasperating. The
executives of Salon, an online magazine, have been the target of several
critics, including Michael Kinsley, the editor of a competing online
magazine, Slate. Kinsley wrote an April column saying that the numbers
in the company's S.E.C. filing differed greatly from what Salon's editor,
David Talbot, had been telling the media. Salon, though known for
distributing provocative opinions, has chosen not to respond because any
comments could be construed as a violation of the quiet period, Salon
executives have said.

On Wednesday, though, Salon announced an E-commerce deal with
Culturefinder Inc., an arts information and ticketing Web site. Shares of
Salon gained $1.8125, to close that day at $12.75, up from their $10.50
offering price of June 22.

Copyright 1999 The New York Times Company






To: Matt Brown who wrote (95)7/11/1999 2:33:00 AM
From: $Mogul  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1884
 
That book value is Wrong. The Correct Book Value per DLJ is $3.06, with 33.97 Total Shares Outstanding, giving this company a mkt. Cap of Approx. 891M

Good Luck All.

By the way I really think INIT is a better play, but I do like ISLD prospects, good right up in last monthes Red Herring too!!

$Mogul