Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jack Rayfield who wrote (4131)	7/10/1999 1:03:00 AM
From: GWD	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8117

Hi Jack It seems to me,that by now it has become crystal clear that Mr Jacobs has no intention to address some of the concerns raised by some of the regular contributors on this forum. It goes without saying that most CEO'S don't like to be told by there shareholders how to run their company,and are not in general that receptive to constructive criticism.After all they are the captain of the ship and will decide what ever course to take. Having said that,Mr Jacobs generally in the past has always replied to this forum,and had developed what seemed on the surface a reasonable liaison with it members. So why at this point in time has he decided to ignore the valid questions of LOR and yourself. We can only speculate what his reasons are.Unfortunately as shareholders we can only voice our concern,and hope that Mr Jacob's has enough respect for us to dignify us with a reply. After all some of the 3 million in cash PYNG has in the bank was raised by shareholders. Regards GWD

To: Jack Rayfield who wrote (4131)	7/10/1999 2:27:00 PM
From: Stephen Krupa	Respond to of 8117

Jack, I join you in your support of LOR. Your response to him is what I was trying to say in my earlier posts. But, I only own 9,000 shares plus the 1,000 in wife's portfolio. So, I don't carry much weight, which is fine since you and LOR are expressing my thoughts, as if you both are reading my mind. The following might be interpreted that the product has been seen in a place not mentioned previously. Can we count a handful of sales toward the "goal?". An acquaintance told me that his grandson was at an interview at the Reading Hospital in Reading, PA. (Where's that? About 65 miles east of Philadelphia.) The grandson said that the FAST 1 product is included in a procedural (?) handbook in the cardiac clinic. However, I don't believe that it behooves me to try to clarify/confirm due to the current attitude from the Pyng management.