SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WAVX Anyone? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pluvia who wrote (8092)7/10/1999 1:41:00 PM
From: Benchman  Respond to of 11417
 
I just took a look at Jas's posts and yours. The only difference I see, is that Jas was positive on the stock while you were negative. He had many posts on the WAVX thread that were in a positive light. You had many negative one's. You also went further by posting the same message on Anthony's thread. The judgement looks a little one sided to me. Just my opinion.

One other note, I bought this stock the other day at around 15. Besides the potential here, the chart looked good at that time showing that 14ish should be the bottom. Add the fact that news will be coming Monday (Pacific thing) and the Russell 2000 addition (funds that have to have Russell 2000 stocks will be adding, providing a nice base here). The stock looks to go higher near term. Again just my opinion.

Pluvia were you still shorting at 14 3/4 or lower? I can't believe anyone would have at the point. It really didn't look rewarding at that time. From 19 sure, but the 14's??

Anyway, that's my 2 cents, good luck all,

B



To: Pluvia who wrote (8092)7/10/1999 2:02:00 PM
From: Harold Lehman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11417
 
You are, if anything, a negative hype artist. And I have already filed a complaint about your style, with posting numbers included.

So we shall see.



To: Pluvia who wrote (8092)7/10/1999 3:25:00 PM
From: Witold  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 11417
 
You tell the truth they hype? I strongly protest. SI judgement has been very wrong! Witold