Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lisa who wrote (13133)	7/10/1999 2:03:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

Lisa, that is the standard is civil cases: period... ...Just because a man is visited in an office by his children, it does not perforce become a residence. The official residence is apart from the workplace... ...Let me ask you, do you honestly believe that evidence that a man had cheated on his wife in his own home would be inadmissable in a divorce proceeding? How about questions about whether or not he had cheated? How about questions about cheating in his office? Suppose it were a workplace action, but his office were in his home. Would his receptionist not be able to sue him? Sorry, but none of your assertions hold- up. As soon as a judge ruled, he was obliged to respond truthfully...