SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PiMac who wrote (13161)7/10/1999 9:26:00 PM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13994
 
Vulnerable in his innocence? You are not smoking green leafy materials tonight are you? What about the brutal treatment of Kathleen Willey? The man acts like a gangster.

I understand the desire to defend your champion, but he has long since become indefensible.



To: PiMac who wrote (13161)7/10/1999 10:08:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
Whether he was innocent of her charge or not is irrelevant. He tried to deny another citizen her day in Court. The President, our highest elected official sworn to faithfully uphold the execute the laws of our country tried to deny another citizen her day in Court. He did that by proffering false testimony and fabricated evidence. He then lied to cover up his "improper" relationship about which he lied and used the power of his office to carry off the lie. Bubba made it criminal when he lied to the Court and lied to the GJ. He's a scum bag. What's so complicated about that? JLA




To: PiMac who wrote (13161)7/10/1999 10:14:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
And all the "evidence" I've seen says he was guilty, including the fact that he paid Ms. Jones $850,000.00 to go away. So what? JLA



To: PiMac who wrote (13161)7/11/1999 8:34:00 PM
From: George Coyne  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13994
 
< All the evidence I've seen says he was in fact innocent of her charge. >>

And what evidence have you seen?

G. W.