SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: charred who wrote (3016)7/10/1999 9:26:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Respond to of 4504
 
<<However you seem confident that the town is moving. The cost of this will be included in the overall capital costs of the project which inturn will lower the ROI. It will be expensive but not impossible >>

This is one thing we will have to keep for the feasibility. It could well be that TG-1 may never be mined IF they come up with huge resources on TG3, TG7 and beyond. After all, the TG3 anomlay appears to be much bigger than TG-1.



To: charred who wrote (3016)7/10/1999 9:57:00 PM
From: Bruce Robbins  Respond to of 4504
 
I do not know whether or not they will move the town. If TG-3 turns up similar mineralization, it won't matter as much to the stock. I do not imagine that the Government of Peru will want to leave the town of Tambo Grande over a mineral resource. Besides, why would anyone want to live on top of sulfides. Apparently, there is a good correlation with haunted houses and sulfide mineralization <g>.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News