SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SI Bob who wrote (6861)7/11/1999 1:33:00 AM
From: SIer formerly known as Joe B.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32884
 
SI Admin (Bob) ,
If Nostradamus was interpreted correctly by Jeremy Lovell
the world could be ending in the next two weeks: #reply-9176198l
Out of curiosity, if the world does end will SI give refunds
to paying members? I hope you consider this appropriate for
this thread. I think it is because new mebers might want to wait
a few weeks to join if you won't be giving refunds.



To: SI Bob who wrote (6861)7/11/1999 1:09:00 PM
From: Jacalyn Deaner  Respond to of 32884
 
Si BOB - how about a private message library that is available to a court with a subpoena under the discovery rules in a law suit, those privacy issues are not covered and although you cannot yourself remove nor access them, a court action can cause them to be produced and admitted.

What is good to know, also, is that all private messages I have received and produced ARE accessible and WILL be produced when called for.

What is also good to know is that the legal department at SI has admitted to being negligent in not notifying the participants of SI when their private information has been accessed, not providing the names of those requesting the information, the purpose, nor the time proscribed by law to the SI participant to make a response to acquiesce or deny the release. And this information is released without subpoenas! Imagine that.

I have an email from the legal department from a Mr. Caldwell completely detailing the SI policy if you care to review it. To date, the SI legal department has failed to respond to my inquiry as to who SI provided my information to last week without a subpoena and without proper notification to me. But I understand SI is trying to improve upon its best efforts.

Do not remove ANY of my posts from any thread I have participated upon, I appreciate the one request I had sent you on an open board to remove a post that was offensive and without substantive comment. However, it could be produced if required, verbatim, and the recipient of that post has since forgiven me and could also provide the post verbatim.

It appears that the light is finally dawning on participants of Silicon Investor regarding their privacy and the imperative necessity for FACTS and substantive content are available for close scrutiny and subject to cause a complete re-education of the interpretation of "privacy rights" "liability" and "accountability" - this includes participants, as well as the companies that are discussed.

Silicon Investor is promoted as a forum to discuss the aspects of a company - what I would like to know is the course the forum sees itself as evolving into.

Anyway, hope you continue to do your GOOD job SI Bob and thanks for all you have done to date. Sincerely,

Jacalyn M. Deaner



To: SI Bob who wrote (6861)7/11/1999 3:54:00 PM
From: SIer formerly known as Joe B.  Respond to of 32884
 
The new.gif is broken.

techstocks.com

Edit at 4:01:
The New.gif is back from it's break.