Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: William Brotherson who wrote (46260)	7/11/1999 12:54:00 PM
From: Howard C.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

Give me a break, if I remember correctly MTEI was suspended for "only" two weeks also. It's so hard sometimes to remain nice, you are so correct. Mr. Optimist, of the thousands of companies that the SEC investigates, how many do they feel are serious enough to suspend trading? They can get request documents without suspending trading, did that thought ever enter your "analysis?" Did it? Yes or no? Did it? You can actually subpoena documents without halting trading. After you examine the documents, if you don't like what you see, you suspend trading. Did I miss something, Mr. Screamer? Sorry, but you were patronizing in your post, it doesn't become you. Now can we drop it and be nice again? We're all under a bit of tension, but let's not let Jimmy off the hook, he runs the company, we must hold him responsible....no? Thanks. Peace. And here's to successful hamburgers, we'll need it (private joke).

To: William Brotherson who wrote (46260)	7/11/1999 5:05:00 PM
From: ChatterjeeP	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

This trading halt is a legal and bureaucratic matter. Hence, it should not be directly handled by a business leader or technical man. It should be handled most efficiently by our attorney, supposedly skilled in bureaucratic and legal matters regarding SEC. Yes, Jimmy should be ultimately responsible and push our attorneys to resolve this matter most amicably and promptly. But, his personal presence in Washington is not needed and the company is better served by his pursuit of real revenue-bearing business. The only part about this "trading halt" I vaguely like is it will push Digitcom to be proactive in supplying us,the investors, with complete and detailed news of the contracts. I personally do not think that we, the long investors, have been served by this halt and Digitcom should clear this mess up, quickly and completely, through their SEC lawyers. Feeling like Joan of Arc at the SEC inquisition stake, Partha