Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Jamerson who wrote (85260)	7/11/1999 5:23:00 PM
From: Fred Fahmy	Respond to of 186894

Pual, <Many box makers won't believe their story this time around.> Given their history with the other K's, can you blame them?? FF

To: Paul Jamerson who wrote (85260)	7/11/1999 6:47:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: "I know for a fact that the K7 exist. The product is pretty impressive" There are K7 foils, K7 announcements, K7 introductions, K7 lovers, K7 haters, K7 rumors, K7 promises, K7 reviews even K7 adds, but..... no K7s. In the absence of any available K7s, K7 systems, K7 customers, K7 specifications or K7 benchmarks, I think it is a bit of a stretch to say they have an actual product. This is a little like Scumbria not realizing it has to be here to be here. They have to have a product before you can say they have a product. EP