Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IDT *(idtc) following this new issue?* -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andrew H who wrote (11162)	7/11/1999 5:33:00 PM
From: Hawaii60	Respond to of 30916

From yahoo Respectfully disagree about IDTC not gaining long term on NTOP ownership. I recently cited DSPG now making 52 wk highs after the debut of AUDC. It's a better example cuz they are both VOIP co.and recall that they only retained 23% of AUDC. Just another opinion. BTW -DUO was smart enough to play both if I recall correctly

To: Andrew H who wrote (11162)	7/11/1999 5:57:00 PM
From: Hawaii60	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 30916

Check this out from ragingbull board: Cramer is disavowing that he could possible be corrupt enough to be in cahoots with Greenberg. He specificly said: < if you think i am corrupt enough to be in cahoots with Greenberg I DONT WANT YOU READING ME. > By: skeeter_98103 Reply To: NoneSunday, 11 Jul 1999 at 11:40 AM EDT Post # of 3947 Received the attached as a reply from the "infamous" James Cramer. I think those of us who responded with disgust, distain and action must have certainly touched a few nerves at the Street Neil: YOu have a lot to learn about my ethics. Until then, I do hope that you will cancel your subscriptionbecause if you think i am corrupt enough to be in cahoots with Greenberg I DONT WANT YOU READING ME. You dont deserve it jjccdonald (by way of Michael Goldberg ) (by way of Laurence Blenman ) (by way of Michael Goldberg )" wrote: Mr. Cramer: Read the Greenberg twaddle this p.m. regarding IDTC. Must admit, I was disappointed to find on the surface, and based upon content, that your crew seems to be either into sensationalism or worse heavily involved in shorting or manipulating this stock. Right at the time a key subsidiary of IDTC is going through its IPO. Strange timing coincidence don't you think ? And, is there perhaps some hidden jealousy at play ? At any rate, you've lost me as a subscriber, and I shall be pleased to advise all I come into contact with, that your crew lack the essential currency of trust, needed to be a believable investment resource. Which by the way was essentially one of your bylines wasn't it ? Sincerely, BoardMark MemberMarkIgnore PosterReport TOS Violation

To: Andrew H who wrote (11162)	7/11/1999 10:46:00 PM
From: vinod Khurana	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30916

Hello Andrew and the rest of the investors on this board who read my post. First, I am long this stock. I have never shorted any stock nor plan on doing so unless you can convince me that the stock is definetly heading down in the short term. Second, I was upset at the fact that $25 million was loaned to a company that has not kept up with good business practices but above all, that the money was invested in a one man company and whose business activity is unknown. Third, IDTC has never disclosed what benefit it received from investing $25 million. What the investment a favour of some sort ? Whilst true that I have not done my research into the past two years on IDTC, I was surprised that Street.com would pick up a story like this and publish it without it being checked out first. I am sure that Street.Com wants to make a "good" name for itself. Has any apology beeen made by Street.Com or are they still holding firm on their story ? This issue only raises concern about the investments IDTC is making. I have nothing against IDTC and would not like to see its stock sink further but I have to take into account any -'ve or +'ve article published. As a matter of fact, on a technical basis, I expect this stock to strike between $26 - $30 any day now. I wish all the longs well...I happen to one of them.

To: Andrew H who wrote (11162)	7/12/1999 9:24:00 AM
From: blankmind	Respond to of 30916

andrew other long termers on the board, i do not understand the cynicism towards all these posters who suddenly show up for our own good. we can put them into one of 3 categories: 1. long, with nothing but negative comments. 2. no position, but they have love in their hearts and want you to sell because they recognize the company sucks. 3. long a long time, but just never posted. but want you to sell since there are clear problems with the company. for example since vinod just posted the hg articles, you can assume he just has not found the ab rebuttal. i am sure in a few days vinod will be posting the ab rebuttal as he catches up on his dd. invesotrs should realize idtc did in a sense respond, via ab, a most proper and forceful way of doing it.