SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Niels who wrote (64816)7/11/1999 11:34:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583792
 
Niels, <before anyone is going to replace a critical Xeon server>
Have critical servers being replaced by Xeons already?
It is something new to me... :)



To: Niels who wrote (64816)7/12/1999 1:21:00 AM
From: Petz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1583792
 
Niels, re: reluctance to replace PIII or Xeon servers with K7.
Not at all true for the thousands of "little guys" who are just now buying their first servers and setting them up. And many of these new guys will pass on the Xeon and only consider either the PIII or the K7 (in a few months).

They would have said the same thing about using Linux six months ago. ("No one would ever consider replacing Windows NT with Linux for critical server applications" : NOT)

Petz



To: Niels who wrote (64816)7/12/1999 7:07:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson  Respond to of 1583792
 
Niels, New places will switch. established sockets will probably stay. Soon after full rollout and implementation of single and multiply connectable server type K7s with extra cache etc you will get people buying, trying and benchmarking these K7s. As those benchmarks go so will the K7 server models. No-one will be first, economics will make nearly all try it and offer it and Intel will have to meet price if it passes those benchmarks.

Bill