Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Howard C. who wrote (46318)	7/12/1999 12:15:00 PM
From: ChatterjeeP	Respond to of 50264

If the choice were.. 1) Keep the contracts under wrap for political reasons OR 2)Publicize the contract, comply with SEC but you lose that very contract What would Digitcom do? We have been hinted at this scenario by DGIV operative previously when we pushed verifiable real contracts news. If that's the reality, I think the only solution is: Show that contract to SEC, they talk to the foreign partners and are satisfied with its veracity, but they agree that they cannot make the contract public and just say "Begin trading" we are satisfied. (without telling how they are satisfied to us, the investing public) I am just trying to find a way out. I guess I am trying to do the job for our attorneys:-) To those lawyers, earn your keep and satisfy SEC without breaking our contracts, Partha PS: I am ASSUMING that Digitcom has those contracts to start with as many have referred to. I have no firm knowledge that they do.

To: Howard C. who wrote (46318)	7/12/1999 12:18:00 PM
From: E'Lane	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

They better 'fess up now. What do you think? I think they should fax copies of those contracts to the SEC as their way of "fessing up", Howard. How's that? E!

To: Howard C. who wrote (46318)	7/12/1999 12:22:00 PM
From: Bill C	Respond to of 50264

Couldn't agree more. The SEC should not be thought of as a "business partner" with DGIV, or any other company. It is a police organization. It's charter is investor protection. The SEC makes no judgments about the viability of a business, only about whether that business is communicating accurately to all shareholders. While many here are heavily invested in DGIV and hope this trading halt blows over like a bad storm, unless DGIV promptly supplies the SEC with the info it is demanding, there will be birdsh*t in the bottom of the cuckoo clock before we see trading again. imho.