SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rande Is who wrote (9434)7/12/1999 12:13:00 PM
From: Trumptown  Respond to of 57584
 
Rande...looks like someone stepped on it again at $6...will hold this one for a while to see what Brilliant DevelopmEnts we see...<g>

SR



To: Rande Is who wrote (9434)7/12/1999 1:16:00 PM
From: Dale Baker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57584
 
Rande, a BDE question which addresses a broader issue: everyone who wants to know has learned that the convertible is not floorless. The BDE thread has great lists of all the deals that will start this fall.

But there aren't enough buyers to hold the stock over 6. So what's wrong with this picture? It isn't lack of awareness. Somebody is discounting the current news very sharply.

While others bemoan the fate of the poor shorts, don't forget we know how to manage money, set stops and follow our positions just like longs. In fact, I have ten times as many long positions as shorts. Don't get too carried away with the melodrama.

Thanks.



To: Rande Is who wrote (9434)7/12/1999 7:24:00 PM
From: xcr600  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 57584
 
Rande, not sure if you have seen Zeev's post regarding BDE. There still is a less damaging type of floorless in place. I mentioned it the other day. It is for $6mln. Here is the link.

techstocks.com

What he says makes sense since the stock is having a hard time holding anything over 6. It rallied from 4 3/4 to 6 easily, but now has hit a wall. It's going to really take a swift kick in it's ass tick get it back over 6, imho.

x

p.s. still long, so no short bashing here<g>