SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe S Pack who wrote (25512)7/12/1999 12:15:00 PM
From: Midtown eBoy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41369
 
I don't think this is true.



To: Joe S Pack who wrote (25512)7/12/1999 12:20:00 PM
From: Steve Lamont  Respond to of 41369
 
I don't this this is true either..

I saw almost the exact same type of message relating to the canadian goverment over 6 months ago..

I'm sure it's a hoax.

Actually here is a newpaper article debuking the canadian version:



canoe.ca


Wednesday, April 21, 1999

Cyberspace tax e-mail is nothing but a hoax
By IAN HARVEY -- Toronto Sun

Netizens! Put down your weapons.

For the past week Canadian Internet users have been circulating an e-mail warning of yet another dastardly government plot to introduce a tax into cyberspace.

Under the apparent auspices of a Toronto law firm it warns, "The Government of Canada is attempting to quietly push through legislation that will affect your use of the Internet. Under proposed legislation Canada Post will be attempting to bill e-mail users out of alternate postage fees."

It cites a bogus Bill 602P and Richard Stepp QC of Toronto as the white knight working to save us from a tax that could add $180 a year to the average Netizen's costs.

It's all rather noble, except for one thing.

There is no truth to it. Any of it.

There no Richard Stepp, no Bill 602P, no committee, no proposal driven by Canada Post.

It's a hoax. A pretty good one, but a hoax nonetheless.

And a gag which fooled some pretty high-profile people, among them corporate public relations people and some journalists who were busily checking facts for a page one story.

The big hole in the story, of course, is that anyone wanting to avoid the tax could simply set up a free mail account with an American site such as Hotmail.

But it was good try, whoever you are.

Take a bow.



To: Joe S Pack who wrote (25512)7/12/1999 12:26:00 PM
From: James Fulop  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41369
 
(ot)
I think I have seen that a couple of times in the last two years... each time somebody picks it up thinking it is current, and the scare starts all over again.



To: Joe S Pack who wrote (25512)7/12/1999 1:06:00 PM
From: JB  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 41369
 
<<<<<Subject: Legislation that will affect your use of the Internet'
Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay online and continue using email: >>>>

This thing made the rounds several times over the last 4-6 months, I think its mostly misinformation. JB



To: Joe S Pack who wrote (25512)7/12/1999 2:22:00 PM
From: John Carpenter  Respond to of 41369
 
This scenario is extremely remote, because the U.S. Postal
Service would provide no consideration, no service for the
receipt of this fee. One could argue that we already receive
no consideration for the taxes we pay, but this example
would be blatant robbery- a fee for no service rendered.