SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Monsanto Co. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dan Spillane who wrote (2276)7/13/1999 9:52:00 PM
From: Anthony Wong  Respond to of 2539
 
U.S. unveils new steps to calm fears of transgenic food
6:15 PM
By Julie Vorman

WASHINGTON, July 13 (Reuters) - The Clinton Administration on
Tuesday unveiled a series of steps to address consumer fears about the
safety of genetically modified foods, and asked seed companies to report
any unexpected problems with new varieties of corn, soybeans and other
crops.

The safety of genetically modified (GM) crops threatens to worsen
already-strained trade relations with the European Union at a time when
U.S. farmers have planted half their soybean fields with plants engineered
to resist pests and disease.

Some European consumer groups, wary after a series of scares over
tainted food, have called for a moratorium on all GM foods until more is
known about their long-term effects.

In the administration's strongest language to date, Agriculture Secretary
Dan Glickman on Tuesday warned U.S. biotech and food companies to
heed consumer concerns and adopt voluntary labels for genetically
modified products.

"What we cannot do is take consumers for granted... a sort of 'if you grow
it, they will come' mentality," Glickman said.

"Consumers will eventually come to see the economic, environmental and
health benefits of biotechnology products, particularly if the industry
reaches out and becomes more consumer accessible," he added.

Within five years, virtually all U.S. agricultural exports will be genetically
modified or combined with bulk commodities that have been altered,
according to U.S. officials.


The USDA, which promotes U.S. farm exports abroad, has long endorsed
biotechnology to increase crop yields, improve quality and reduce the use
of pesticides.

But consumers must have confidence that U.S. regulators are protecting
the public health, and "some type of informational label is likely to happen"
for GM foods, Glickman said. Labels are opposed by the food industry,
which contends there is no real difference between GM foods and those
produced by conventional hybrids to improve traits.

To help build public confidence, the USDA will seek an independent
scientific review of its approval process for new GM crops, Glickman said.
Details had yet to be worked out, but the review may be conducted by the
National Academy of Sciences or a similar panel, aides said.

The USDA will create regional centers around the country to evaluate GM
foods over a long period of time and share information with farmers,
consumers and researchers.

"These sorts of actions are clearly called for in the sense that people need
to perceive a system of good checks and balances," said Phil Pardey, a
biotech expert with the non-profit International Food Policy Research
Institute.

Regulators will also press biotech companies to report any "unexpected
or potentially adverse effects" from new GM crops, Glickman said.

"From where we sit, we look forward to hearing more details and
participating in the ongoing discussions that he (Glickman) mentioned,"
said a spokeswoman for Monsanto Co <MTC.N>, which makes GM corn,
soybean and cotton seeds.

The Clinton Administration's decision to spell out other general principles
to guide biotech developments came as U.S. officials scramble to prepare
for the next round of world trade talks due to begin in November.

While Americans have generally been more complacent about biotech
crops than their EU counterparts, last month a petition signed by 500,000
supporters of labels on GM foods was presented to Congress.

U.S. concerns have also increased since Cornell University researchers
recently found that while Bt corn was safe for humans, its pollen killed the
larvae of the monarch butterfly.

Some green groups criticized the administration for not going farther. "The
American public wants more information about GM foods, tough
regulations and labelling," said Larry Bohlen, a vice president of Friends of
the Earth.