Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (64965)	7/12/1999 6:42:00 PM
From: Fred Fahmy	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1579130

Paul, <That's your patented response when people show you what a fool you really are.> Can you believe Ali's stupidity even after seeing a simple example?? At first I thought maybe his misstatement was a language thing but he can't understand it even with numbers right in front of him. I think all these AMD losses (i.e. large negative numbers) have taken their toll. FF

To: Paul Engel who wrote (64965)	7/12/1999 7:16:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579130

Dr. Evil, <what a fool you really are.> ??? Read again: "This is really embarrassing but since you insist: One number can not be 4 times smaller than another." - Fred Fahmy It looks like you too did not mastered the basic math objective for the third grade: addition, subtraction, multiplication, and DIVISION. "One number can not be 4 times smaller than another." - Fred Fahmy This is really embarrassing. Go away, retard. One number can be arbitrary smaller than another, it can be even 0.032 times smaller. But this would be a high school algebra for you, - a class you never took, right?.