SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Spekulatius who wrote (274)7/13/1999 1:07:00 AM
From: scaram(o)uche  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52153
 
Ralf:

Strongly agree with everything you said. However, technologies are cheap right now, and $150 million can buy opportunity. I feel that they'd really have to muck up to turn my 40 cents into something worth 40 cents.

There is no question..... I'd prefer to find a company that will turn my 40 cents into $4 on the basis of a growing, vibrant business. However, we have an idiom..... don't look a gift horse in the mouth..... it means don't turn away a gift on the basis of criteria you'd use if paying.

$150 million, summer of '99? That's license to develop one heck of a business within five years. Downside?...... they could pull "a Chiron". We'll see.

Good comments, very much appreciated.

Rick



To: Spekulatius who wrote (274)7/13/1999 1:14:00 AM
From: jeffbas  Respond to of 52153
 
Slight correction: Deknatel/Seprafilm PLUS $150 MILLION CASH (plus
small biotherapeutic R&D operation) is now valued at $65 million. I find that crazy.

By the way Collier said with a straight face on the Roadshow that the surgical business was more valuable than when they bought it. I think he was weasel-wording it -- that the company was worth more WITHOUT reference to the $250 million they paid. As I have said before it ought to be worth $100 million. Therefore, I look at this as 25 cent dollars not 40 cent dollars (65/150 cash + 100 business) -- and
Seprafilm probably has some value as well.

What I do not understand is why GENZ did not sell those businesses,
take the one time earnings hit, and put the $150 million cash to better uses. Anyone have any idea?

As I noted on the GZSP thread today, institutional sales of GZSP they either did not want or could not hold by their charters was at least 1/2 of today's trading volume and the stock was stable.



To: Spekulatius who wrote (274)7/13/1999 6:39:00 AM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52153
 
< the surgical sector turned out to be tough business.>

You can say that again!!!!! That said, it does not appear that the current situation can persist, as the sector will attract no new money. I wouldn't be surprised if owning a smidge just to hold the sector to your attention over the next few years could net you very nice returns.

DAK