Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : WINR-Secure Banking to Global Internet Gaming & E-Commerce -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael john stout who wrote (5664)	7/13/1999 10:07:00 AM
From: swedelo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6545

Mr. whoever, You are bobtcat2 but you aren't Sarbinson? Then why is your name listed as Sam Sarbinson on your RB profile? Are you the guy on the grasy knoll as well? ************************************************************************* Alias Page for bobtcat2 Current E-Mail Address:Private Name:Sam Sarbinson *************************************************************************

To: michael john stout who wrote (5664)	7/13/1999 3:01:00 PM
From: hman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6545

Dear Mr Multiple Personality: You Stated:"Yes sir, there is a strong possibility that I am bobtcat. I am not Sarbinson. Ande so what?" My reply: What is your purpose of having multiple and different identities on these Message Boards. Also, as Swedelo asks, what is the complete list of identities that you have assumed under both SI and RB. Most participants on these message boards would say that the practice of having several identities is to be throw an element of evasiveness and confusion into the discussions here. Perhaps you can shed some light on this for us. You stated:"Also, I was assured over the phone by Mr. Holmes several weeks ago that they were ahead of revenue projections, now this does not seem the case. Wouldn't this make you a little angry and/or suspicious of management?" My reply: By your own admission, you should know that a lot of information from CFG is inaccurate and untrustworthy. I quote" By: bobtcat2 Reply To: 2213 by Wayne_Balkwill Tuesday, 29 Jun 1999 at 10:14 AM EDT Post # of 2838 I feel like calling CFG and ripping Kevin a new hole. Where is the goddamned news that he thought would push the stock past 3 dollars? I remember somebody writing that he had said this. Come on, CSIN and GGNC are coming out with news, why can't WINR?! Damn it, maybe they're not making any money. Where's our 30 cents per share in 1999 now? Liars." On the other hand, I have no evidence that revenue projections are falling apart. We have been talking about earning projetions on both SI and RB lately. What you seem to be complaing about is that your own expectations for earnings projections (where did these come from anyway) seem to be in conflict with the expectations for earning projections from others such as Swedelo. Finally, no I am not suspicious of management. I am very suspicious of CFG, yourself and the other multiple personality practitioners that we have recently uncovered. If indeed you are innocent of trying to manipulate investors sentiments regarding WINR through the use of these Message Boards, then my apology to you. Until my suspicions are assuaged however, everything that you say here and on RB is under scrutiny. Regards hman (on both SI and RB)