Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Porter who wrote (65063)	7/13/1999 11:56:00 AM
From: kash johal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580041

Steve, Re:" PS. I ahve no problems with him using the PIII-500 or whatever. It is still the same core, albeit there are several tweaks and re-layouts along the way to .25." Look he said that he wasn't going to use any mid like kickers - that was his definition. Clearly the PIII's introduced a few months ago were a mid-life kicker. He should have used the PII-450 period. If you look at what he used on the rest of his charts he didn't use a recently introduced core that was less than 6 months old to compare the new core. Anyway, I agree it's a moot point- once Cu hits they should be north of 800Mhz. Regards, Kash

To: Steve Porter who wrote (65063)	7/13/1999 4:01:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580041

Steve - RE: "You are working from an old roadmap I think. The latest information I have shows AMD at 750 or higher by Q4 of this year." I hope AMD will talk about the production aspect of the the Athlon either tomorrow or when Athlon systems are released within one month. All of AMD's talk of what they have projected publicly (650 Q3, 700 Q4) means diddly squat unless they can give as good optimisitc production talk. All we have heard about Athlon production is from analysts. I want to hear AMD publicly talk about Athlon production.