Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Bearcat (BEA-C) & Stampede (STF-C) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tommy D who wrote (1930)	7/13/1999 2:12:00 PM
From: TANTRAMAR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2306

I also got the same info this morning. To get a better idea of what the issues were in that case check out the detailed decision by the EUB on their web site (www.eub.gov.ab.ca). From what I have read we are not in the same ballpark regarding H2S levels in the proposed Turner Valley wells. (2 or 3% H2S vs 34%+ H2S) If the EUB is prepared to allow the drilling of this Can 88 well then they should also allow the drilling of the T V wells. The big question is what conditions will they put on these wells and how long will this process take. In the case of this Can 88 well it took about 1 year for the decision to be finalized after the hearing was completed. As the TV wells are not in the same category as the Can 88 well I hope the decision process will not take as long.