Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg Jung who wrote (85531)	7/13/1999 6:56:00 PM
From: Diamond Jim	Respond to of 186894

So what are you trying to say? You lost me fairly early on in your ramblings.

To: Greg Jung who wrote (85531)	7/13/1999 7:00:00 PM
From: Timothy Liu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

> 500 MILLION DOLLAR SHORTFALL ... > to an income "loss" of $275 million. 8c/share short of his .55, or .47c. > However they reported 51 cents. So by hook or by crook they were > able to manufacture 4 cents more in "income" just so you won't feel > so bad. Can't use the 55% margin to get the 'loss of income' that you mentioned. The most important thing you forget is TAX. Intel is not going to get that 8c but 5.3c (33% bracket). Taking into consideration that gross margin is a couple percent over Osha's model and you can see the earning is right on the money and Intel did not 'manufacture income'. Tim JMHO of course.