Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Three Amigos Stock Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ken W who wrote (16273)	7/14/1999 4:09:00 AM
From: Ditchdigger	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29382

Hi Ken, looks like your shortage of Calf unleaded continues.. biz.yahoo.com " If granted, the variance would require Chevron to pay a penalty of 15 cents a gallon, amounting to about $22 million if all gallons are sold." Who ultimately should pay this extra .15 ?Will be interesting to see what CARB decides.....DD

To: Ken W who wrote (16273)	7/14/1999 7:45:00 AM
From: Ditchdigger	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29382

Ken, why don't the Birkenstock wear'in,bean sprout eat'in politicos(all in fun<g>) in Calf. force legislation on an increased number of NG/LG powered vehicles to offset gasoline emissions? Would seem to me this offset would allow some of the taxpayers to burn cheaper gasoline refined to standards outside Ca.,as opposed to specially designed gasoline fuels? It appears NG is going to power the future,why not gradually implement the change now? Is this occurring there? Are not a certain number of vehicles supposed to burn alternative fuels,as per state legislation?If so, why not increase the %? DD