Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (85612)	7/14/1999 6:56:00 AM
From: amic	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

KIS, are you saying you think analysts have a clue about what is going on in the industry? ah ah ah, good one.

To: KeepItSimple who wrote (85612)	7/14/1999 7:41:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

KIS - <So you're saying that all of the professional analysts who predicted 53 cents dont follow the company or take the industry seriously? If they weren't surprised, why didnt they lower their estimates if they knew Q2 was going to be tough?> Who cares? Intel didn't miss its numbers, the analysts missed theirs! Q2 is the slowest Q in this business. Nothing terribly surprising yesterday. Forward looking statements from Intel were more bullish than last years Q2...you're making a big deal about -.02 from a fictional number to begin with!!!!