SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (27537)7/14/1999 12:40:00 PM
From: Les H  Respond to of 50167
 
US CRUDE, INTERMEDIATE CORE PRICE HIKES BROADER FOR 2ND MONTH

08:52 EDT 07/14 --Without Increases in Cars, Trucks, PPI Overall and Core Would Be Flat

By Denny Gulino
bonds-online.com

WASHINGTON (MktNews) - An unexpected decline in passenger car and light truck prices pulled the U.S. Producer Price Index and its core rate into negative territory in June, the Labor Department reported Wednesday, but for the second month, price hikes at the raw materials and intermediate levels broadened out.

The PPI's finished goods index was down 0.1% and the core rate was down 0.2%, contrary to anticipated increases of about the same size.

"If you had no influence from passenger cars and light trucks, that in fact those two indices, finished and core, would have been flat for the month," Bureau of Labor Statistics analyst Brian Catron told Market News International as the report was being made public.

"In passenger cars and light trucks, we had no seasonal expectations," he continued. "You get get discounting and the normal kind of model year tailing off through the summer months, with a typical decline in the July index ... and finally a fairly sizable decline in September. But this month there certainly was no seasonal factor," he continued. "The price decline that came in was apparently just competitively based."

The June results pulled the 12-month change in passenger car prices into a negative, down 0.5%. However prices for light trucks -- which include minivans, sport utilities and pickups -- show a 3.4% gain for 12 months.

"Step back to the earlier stages of processing you do see price increases," Catron said. Core crude materials were up 0.5%, as was core intermediate materials. For crude, "that's not particularly new," he said, noting the May increase in that category of 2.3%.

But intermediate core prices, which up until May had seen mostly construction related price hikes, began to show a broadening range of increases in May. Now, "for the second month in row that statement can be made," he said of both categories.

The intermediate core increase of 0.5% "was led by industrial chemicals, up 1.9%," he said. "We had an increase of 9.7% for plywood, influencing both construction materials and durable manufacturing materials categories. Softwood lumber went up 4.5%."

For the sake of comparison, he said, "that 4.5% is bigger than anything in the last two and a half years. That's not to say there haven't been some sizable swings, in the upper 3% range." Outside of construction, thermoplastic resins rose 2.2% in price in June, something influenced a great deal by rising energy prices," he said.

"In crude core materials, the two big categories are wastepaper, which had an 18.8% increase," an exceptionally big jump even for that volatile category, he said. Softwood logs, the other leader at the crude level, was a category up 2.0%.

Capital equipment prices declined 0.3% in June, the most since 0.4% in October of 1994, due to light trucks "which carries the weight in capital equipment," he said.

While gauging the degree of passthrough of core and intermediate prices to finished goods is a "very complex picture," the speed at which crude petroleum price increases influence the end stages can be seen in thermoplastic resins, he said.

Liquified petroleum gas, such as propane, uses crude petroleum as an input and jumped 11.7% in price in June, the main reason there was not a larger decline in energy prices. The overall energy index dropped 0.3% in June because of declines in gasoline and residential electric power, where "the seasonal factors look for a fairly considerable increase in rates this time of year," he said. "Some products pass through prices very quickly, like energy, and others are so slow," Catron said, as labor costs and productivity have their impact on overall costs.

Expectations in a Market News International survey of economists centered on a rise of 0.1% both in
the overall finished goods index and the PPI core rate for June. In the previous month, the PPI rose
0.2% overall and 0.1% in the core rate, both within expectations.



To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (27537)7/14/1999 1:14:00 PM
From: Al Serrao  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50167
 
Uncle, strong dollar and falling gold and CRB are all good for the bond and there are more problems coming in latin America later this year.Recently bought Amer Cen Target 2025 BTTRX which are Zero's could have a nice run.

What is your read on Japan and SNE? Do we have to break 19,000 on the NEKEI for this move to be for real? Best regards.



To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (27537)7/16/1999 9:31:00 PM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 50167
 
A very good analysis by Motley Fools on may be 'questionable reasons' why ATHM is suffering?

Shares of Excite@Home (Nasdaq: ATHM) continue to decline because
people fear that it will lose its exclusive grip on the cable properties owned
by AT&T (NYSE: T). I question this logic. Has Apple Computer (Nasdaq:
AAPL) taught us anything? Where is the power in offering a closed system?
A company must do all of the work itself. In contrast, Digital Subscriber Line
(DSL) access is essentially an open standard. Over 300 companies support it
and are building for it, including Cisco Systems (Nasdaq: CSCO) and Intel
(Nasdaq: INTC) -- just two of the companies working on DSL together.
Today, Intel announced the launch of always-on Intel DSL modems later this
year. Estimates call for 2 million DSL users by the end of the year 2000, up
from about 640,000 today, and closing in on cable usage estimates.

If cable lines were essentially open, most of the technology industry would
move quickly to build for cable access and the technology's user-base would
very likely expand more quickly. Solutions to rising traffic issues, one of
AT&T's arguments for keeping access limited, would be addressed and
probably solved by the entire industry. As it is, more corporate momentum is
going into DSL instead.

I believe that a closed stance, on almost any issue, usually arises from a
position of fear rather than one of confidence. If you have the best products,
consumers will side with you no matter who the competitors are.

Anyway, cable modem has many supporters as well, most of them cable and
phone-related companies as well as box makers that are beginning to install
cable modems in PCs. But this is far from the consortium of giants supporting
and soon pushing DSL. High-speed access also represents Internet 2, or the
next stage of the Internet. Estimates are that up to 130 million people will use
broadband by 2007. How many will use cable and how many DSL and
satellite? Predictions abound. The Fool's July Internet Report covers
broadband cable, DSL and satellite access.

Now, the main near-term event:

Excite@Home is expected to announce earnings on Tuesday, July 20. This is
the first time that @Home's results will be combined with Excite's, so the
company will show a few sets of numbers to make everything easier to
understand. A loss for the new company of $0.02 per share is anticipated. It
is still believed that the company will be profitable by year-end.

@Home ended the first quarter with 460,000 subscribers. It should have
grown that number by over 35% sequentially this quarter, to 610,000 or
more. One million is still the magic bogey number for year-end. Second
quarter revenue should be near $90 million, up about 15% from last quarter
en route to over $400 million in revenue for all of 1999, up from $48 million
last year. The number of homes ready for two-way cable access should reach
17 million, up 2 million from the first quarter. Meanwhile, Excite's page
views will likely increase by about 7 to 10 million from last quarter's 77
million. Excite most recently reported 28 million registered users.

Excite@Home is valued at about $17 billion, or nearly half of Yahoo!
(Nasdaq: YHOO) at $32 billion. When you consider that Excite is a leading
portal as well, and that with it you get @Home's cable penetration, which
should reach nearly two-thirds of North American homes, the price of
Excite@Home is far from crazy if Yahoo's price is anywhere near sane. Fear
of open access is restraining Excite@Home's stock.

I can understand why, but I don't necessarily agree with it.

Even if AT&T opens its cable lines, @Home will retain a fat lead and many
advantages over competitors. Remember: literally dozens of long-distance
services are available through common phone lines, but most people use the
leading names (AT&T, MCI, and so forth) for obvious reasons: marketing
power, brand name, and these are often the "default" providers. That's
convenience.

However cable access rights evolve, Excite@Home should land at, or near,
the top of the industry. Management would need to blunder worse than
Charlie Brown to lose its position. For thoughts from someone who knows
the related legal issues inside and out, read this excellent Post of the Day on
Excite@Home from a Fool named Supertanker, who is a municipal attorney.

So, next week we'll see results from Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN),
America Online (NYSE: AOL), and Excite@Home (Nasdaq: ATHM).
Wednesday we previewed America Online's results. Today, we considered
Excite@Home's quarter. We have no information from Amazon, although we
mentioned possibilities on Tuesday after the toy store announcement.

Amazon's revenue should rise ghostlike (with seemingly little effort) to the
$300 million level this quarter following last quarter's $293 million.
Amazon's sales have risen from below ground level to surely top $1 billion
this year. Of course, the effort has truly been tremendous, and barriers to
reaching $1 billion in online sales for new companies are high and rising.
Most new companies will be weighed down with chains.

Soon, either here or when writing a Fool News article, I want to discuss the
several new broadband companies that have been coming public. Until next
time, be Foolish. And remember: quarterly results are short-term results
only. Invest for the long-term.



To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (27537)7/17/1999 8:32:00 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Respond to of 50167
 
Real Estate: US
Real Estate, Real Soon.... (anyone who has house should read it..)

Dateline: 06/28/99

It's been noted time and again, by many in the industry, that there is a definite shift occurring in the real estate industry. I've written about it in the past, and you can find articles popping up in publications like " Smart Money" and on television programs like " CNN" talking about it. So what in the world is happening?

In our fast paced world of the Internet, MTV, and chocolate covered espresso beans, the attention span of the consumer has dropped to the level of my 3 year old daughter.

We (consumers) have demanded and are able to access tons of information with a simple keystroke. Therefore, we demand that people we do business with possess the same capability. In real estate, it's just not happening.

According to REALTOR Magazine, only 70,000(+/-) real estate agents even own a modem. Compare that to the fact that 20% of all households have access to the Internet in some shape or form. Hmmm........

Consumers Possess Knowledge

Just a few years ago, it held true that the only way the homeowner could get information about selling or buying a home, was through a REALTOR. That obviously isn't true anymore since sites like Owners.com and Microsoft's Home Advisor came into being. Even Realtor.com provides a vast array of information for the consumer.

Most homeowners could generally care less about real estate, until it's time to buy or sell their home. The typical homeowner will buy a new home every 4-6 years. Coincidentally, 4-6 years ago, the Internet was very much in it's infancy. Interest rates were low, and people were buying and selling homes like mad.

What we are seeing now is those people who bought or sold a home 4-6 years ago, are still getting the good interest rates, but now they know how to do it on their own. They can effectively market their homes on the Internet, order all of the forms and yard signs necessary for the sale, and can get financing, all online.

Even though the have the capability to sell it on their own, this doesn't necessarily mean that they want to do it on their own. This just means that they know how it is done. Therefore, it is getting more and more difficult for consumers to justify paying a REALTOR 6%-7% to sell their homes.

Let's think about that for a minute. If you bought a home 5 years ago for $100,000 and you sold it today for $125,000, then you would earn $25,000 in equity. The REALTOR that sold you that home 5 years ago earned, lets say, a 7% commission. That's $7,000. Now to sell that same home today, using the same forms, the same advertising, and the same REALTOR, at 7%, you will pay $8,750 to do the same job? To sell the same home?

The Next Step, Fee For Service

The future of real estate, for the REALTOR, will be in charging for your services. Brokerages will be set up differently making the role of the REALTOR, more of a facilitator. Their will be buyer agents and selling agents and then their will be the coordinators.

The buyer agents will deal only with buyers. They will show people homes and will be busy writing up offers. The selling agents will do nothing but list homes. They will advise homeowners on the best approach to getting their homes on the market and will offer the consumer choices instead of just a full blown listing.

Your listings will consist of different levels of involvement. You will be able to choose what works for your particular situation. At the same time, you will be able to enlist the services of a REALTOR to help you at any level of the process. If you need just a Market Analysis, you'll be able to get that, for a fee. If you want assistance in filling out the forms when you get your buyer, you'll be able to get that as well, for a fee.

Then you will have the coordinator. This person will oversee the entire process from start to end ensuring that all of the necessary inspections are ordered, that escrow goes smoothly etc. This will free the other agents to do what they do best, buying and selling homes.

The Crystal Ball Says....

You'll begin to see a change within the next 5 years. It's happening now, but like anything else, change is difficult. You will see a few "rebel" real estate offices begin to spring up to some resistance from the traditional real estate community, but the consumers will love it, embrace it, and demand more.

For related information:

"Selling Your Home Without An Agent" - Smart Money
smartmoney.com

"10 Things Your Broker Won't Tell You" - Smart Money
smartmoney.com

"Realtors Learn To Love The Net" - CNN by Michelle V. Rafter
cnn.com

"Bundling & Unbundling Real Estate Services" - Real Times
By Edith Lank
realtimes.com